Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <ann
linguistlist.org>
Arienne Dwyer cites a comment of Rober Englebretson that is pessimistic about the advantages of DAT compared with cassette tapes regarding digitization: > I don't know that DAT would be any less time-consuming. Unless you > have a soundcard which supports direct digital input (in which case > there will probably be issues with sampling rate), most people find > they end up connecting the line out from their DAT into the line in on > the computer-- essentially re-digitizing the analog signal from the > DAT line-out. There is a simple (and not particularly expensive) alternative to either of these rigmaroles, which we employ in my lab. We have a DAT drive on our local network for data storage (backups etc.), but it can also be used to read DAT audio tapes, allowing DAT digital audio to be transferred to the computer without going via an intermediate analogue stage. - John Coleman Director, Oxford University Phonetics Laboratory 41 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2JF, UK Home page: http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue