Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
Dear listers, I would appreciate it if you could provide me with translations of the following data (taken from Reinhart&Reuland, 1993) in as many languages as possible. (1) a. There were five tourists in the room apart from myself. b. Physicists like yourself are a godsend. c. Max boasted that the queen invited Lucie and himself for a drink. (2) a. *Five tourists talked to myself. b. *A famous physicist has just looked for yourself. c. *Max boasted that the queen invited himself for a drink. I would like to know: (i) if the language in question displays this contrast in grammaticality between (1) and (2) (ii) what "self" forms that language has and what their distribution is. (iii) if other data relevant to the distinction between "self" forms in adjunct positions and those in argument positions. Thank you very much in advance. Elisa Vazquez Iglesias Universidad de Santiago de Compostela SpainMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I am preparing an article for a forthcoming typology handbook on 'introflection', a.k.a. 'discontinuous' or 'nonconcatenative' morphology. I have a few questions that I am researching via databases, but would appreciate any tips that would shorten my search time while helping me achieve good coverage for a handbook of this type. The questions are: (a) Is very thoroughgoing discontinuous morphology** found in language families _other_ than the Semitic? If so, which languages/families? (b) Among currently living Semitic languages/dialects, which use discontinuous morphology in the verb and/or noun-pluralization systems most productively, and which use it least productively? (c) Is anyone in Optimality Theory (and/or other recent 'hot' morphological theories) working on discontinuous morphology in Semitic or other language families? [I have been out of this loop since finishing my dissertation, on Modern Aramaic, in 1993] ** By this I don't mean the occasional construction in which noncontiguous morphs recur with similar meanings, but rather whole (or nearly whole) systems which employ discontinous morphemes/morphemes consisting of noncontiguous morphs/phonemes. If there is interest, I will post a summary to the list. In any case, I will acknowledge helpful sources in my article. Thanks! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Johanna Rubba Assistant Professor, Linguistics ~ English Department, California Polytechnic State University ~ San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 ~ Tel. (805)-756-2184 E-mail: jrubbaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueoboe.aix.calpoly.edu ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear List, I'm interested in advice on teaching a course on the history of English to undergraduate Eng Lit majors with no linguistics background, aside from some phonetics. Any suggestions for course organization and appropriate readings (preferably with exercises) would be greatly appreciated.So far I've looked mostly at Baugh and Cable '93, Quirk and Wrenn '94 on OE, and Jespersen, of course. I'll post a summary to the list. Thanks in advance for your help. Yael-Janette Zupnik Tel-Aviv University zupnikMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueccsg.tau.ac.il