Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <ann
linguistlist.org>
Never got to the end of this seemingly endless list of myths now being put forth as exposing so-called myths many of which have solid scientific evidence to support the hypothese. Unfortunately this summary may lead to more myths being spread than "brought to light" One should, I think, distinguish between real myths which are WIDELY HELD views unsupported by any empirical evidence, and some idiotic statement one heard someone say at some time, and differences of opinion, and alternative hypotheses. To say something is a myth does not make it so. For example, there is more written about the critical age than the three rereferences cited by the person who thinks this is a myth, e.g. the excellent work by Susan Curtiss and others on Genie, Chelsea, etc As David Crystal, in The Cambridge Encyc. of Lg points out, the notion of a critical period was first used by ethologists studying the origin of species-speciric behavior, with early studies on goslings and rats. It may be a controversial hypothesis re language acquisition but it is not a myth. It would take too long through the long list presented in the commuication. ButI hope others on the Linguist List will feel more energetic than I in trying to deal with the views presented. V Fromkin "To get back one's youth, one has merely to repeat one's follies" Oscar WildeMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue