Editor for this issue: Brett Churchill <brett
linguistlist.org>
Much current work in (combinatory) semantics is driven by the idea that sentences provide the input for inference procedures. However, people are generally rather bad at logic and at constructing and analyzing sentences with nontrivial logical structures. So, a sign on a London bus says: Please offer these seats to elderly and disabled people or those with children. What determines the distribtion of "and" and "or"? Another sign promises dire consequences to Any vehicle that is parked otherwise than in accordance with railway byelaws and conditions and any other directions or regulations ... Faced with Don't get a cat unless you don't want any mice in the house people seem to assume it means what they think it ought to mean rather than trying to determine its structre carefully. I have heard it said that each negation costs 300 miliseconds, and that, while people can handle simple cases of modus ponens, they cannot do modus tollens worth a damn. My question is; is there a literature on what people can actually do? In particular, are there experimental results? ======================================================================== Xerox Palo Alto Research Center +1-415-8124343 (office) 3333 Coyote Hill Road +1-415-8124374 (fax) Palo Alto +1-415-3235925 (home) CA 94304 ========================================================================Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I have been asked by my colleague to post a query on this list about the usage of _may_ and _can_ meaning 'permission.' The below are his queries. Please make a reply to me(Tanaka) directly. - ---------------------------------------------- I am now working on a paper about _can_ and _may_. Let me ask you the following three questions. First, is it possible to use _can_ instead of _may_ in (1B)? Secondly, is it possible to use _may_ istead of _can_ in (2B)? (1) A: May I help myself to some more food? B: Yes, you _may_. (2) A: Can I smoke here? B: So far as I know you _can_--there's no notice to the contrary. Thirdly, according to some grammar books, _can_ is used in stead of _may_ to "talk about" permission that has already been given and about things that are allowed by rules and laws. In other words, _can_ is used to report the rules and laws in question, as in (3) and (4). (3) You _can_ get married in Britain when you are 16. (4) It's not fair. You _can_ / *_may_ stay up till ten and I have to go to bed at eight. However, I have found the following examples, which are contrary to the reporting function above. How are these to be explianed? Please make any comments on these (5) and (6). (5) In England you _may_ marry at sixteen. (6) Students _may_ borrow three books at a time from the library. I would be grateful if you would answer these questions. - ---------------------------------------------------------- Thanks a lot in advance. I am looking forward to your reply. Best wishes, Hiroaki Tanaka Associate Professor Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences Tokushima University, Japan 1-1, Minamijousanjioma, Tokushima, 770, Japan phone & fax: +81 886 56 7125 e-mail: hiro-tMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueias.tokushima-u.ac.jp