Editor for this issue: Susan Robinson <sue
linguistlist.org>
A short comment Steven Schaufele's summary:
> This relevant distinction was brought up by another
> respondent, who noted that, at least in terms of its impact on Indo-
> Europeanist studies, in spite of its title Lubotsky's paper really
> addresses the question of the existence in PIE of an actual phonetic
> [a], not a phoneme /a/. (Obviously, if PIE really was a monovocalic
> language it would, by definition, be meaningless to ask whether it had
> a `phoneme' /a/, as distinct from a `phoneme' /i/, /u/, /e/, or /o/;
> it would be more accurate to say that it had a `phoneme' /V/, or
> /+vocalic/, or something like that.)
Actually this respondent (i.e. me) had not thought of that.
It is of course a completely valid point if PIE ever had a single
vowel phone.
My criticism of Lubotsky's paper's title ("Against a PIE phoneme *a")
was in fact that what Lubotsky actually tried to disprove was the
existence of the reconstructed entity *a (however it was pronounced),
not whether PIE had a phoneme /a/. IF we accept Lubotsky's
argument, PIE is left with two vowels *e and *o (besides *i and *u).
Such a reconstruction cannot be attacked on typological grounds for
its lack of /a/, since one of the two (*o is the obvious choice) can
be allowed a phonological realization /a/ with no change at all from
the comparative point of view. *a is not the same as /a/.
If we further merge *e and *o into a pre-Ablaut **a, Pre-PIE still
emerges with a three vowel system (**a, **i, **u). There is no
reason to deny *i and *u vowelhood before the emergence of Ablaut
(IF there is after Ablaut). In conclusion: (Pre-)PIE never had a
single vowel "phoneme". Not only is it typologically implausible, it
does not follow from the reconstruction.
- --------------------------
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv
pi.net
- --------------------------
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Szemerenyi's Einfuehrung is about to be published in English translation by Oxford University Press. The announced price is rather high, but not, I think, as high as the present US price of the German original.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue