Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
Dear Linguist, On Oct.5th I put on a query entitled "predictability and redundancy." I owe thanks to the following people for their answers: Peter Daniels, Daniel E.Collins, Andreas Mengel, Richard Wright Vincent Jenkins and Paul Boersma. Peter Daniels said Predictability == Redundancy, it's a tautology. Daniel Collins cited "Preliminaries to Speech Analysis" by Jakobson, Fant and Halle to illustrate the relations. He concluded that "the difference between vowels is predictatable from the palatalization of the preceding consonant. Therefore, except in special cases, it is redundant, i.e. not needed to make distinctions. Redundant features are invoked (play a discriminative role) chiefly when the message cannot otherwise be interpreted. Paul Boersma presented an answer in terms of algorithm. He holds that "predictability is a property of a linguistic analysis while redundancy is a property of a speaker's grammar and a *possible* result of predictability. The redundancy that JCH (Jakobson, Cherry and Halle) refer to, has to do with minimal linguistic description, and is a *necessary* result of predictability." Richard Wright seems to disagree with the above answers. His is a phonetician point of view. I cite some of his lines Among phoneticians it has long been common knowledge that "redundancy" and "predictable" phonetic differences are neither. Given a particular set of phonological contrast, it is difficult or impossible to predict phonetic details without some knowledge of those phonetic details. Given this lack of phonetic redundancy, phonology seems to have two choices: 1. to propose two modules (phonology, phonetics)... 2. to incorporate all of the non-predictable phonetic detail into the phonological grammar... Vincent Jenkins recommended some important article of Information Theory. Shannon C. E.,1948. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Technical Journal 27 Shannon C.E., 1949, Communication in the Presense of Noise. Proc. I.R.E. Vol.37 pt 1 (1949), pp 10-21 Miller G. 1981. Language and Speech. Freeman Herdan, G. 1966, The Advanced Theory of Language as Choice and Chance. Andreas Mengel also holds that the predicatability will result in redundancy from the view point of information theory. He produced a very interesting illustration with the drawing of a face. Best regards Wang Zhenyu Room 1056, Building 46 Peking University, 100871 Beijing, ChinaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue