Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
Last month, I posted a query concerning diachronic development of rhythmic patterns (syllable vs. stress timing) in languages. I have received more than 20 kind responses. To all respondents, my gratitude. In this posting, I'll summarize the main themes of the respondents. Many respondents pointed out that there are dissenting opinions concerning the stress-timed, syllable-timed dimension or dichotomy. In general, phonologists tend to accept descriptions of languages as stress-timed vs. syllable-timed whereas phoneticians tend to be skeptical about the distinction. Several respondents indicated that these terms have no clear phonetic correlates. We could as easily call one set of languages green and the other purple. It might be premature to examine historical development until we have a clearer idea about what the dimension or dichotomy corresponds to. Robert Port (Indiana) and Alice Faber (Yale) have ongoing research programs in this area. Bob Port has some recent studies available on his home page, http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~port. A number of respondents cautioned that tone (F0) patterns should not be overlooked in describing the rhythmic patterns of languages. Rather than focusing on the timing of syllables, perhaps other properties are responsible for rhythmic impressions. In particular, vowel reduction and variation in syllable structures may responsible. One responded suggested that Brazilian Portuguese may be stress-timed; if this is so, languages may shift from one rhythmic category to another relatively rapidly. The following references were recommended by respondents (often by more than one): Abercrombie, D. (1967) Elements of General Phonetics. Bertinetto, P. M. (1989) Reflections on the dichotomy 'stress- vs. syllable timing', Revue de Phonetique Appliquee, 91/93 99-130. Carvalho, J. B. de (1989) Phonological conditions on Portuguese clitic placement: on syntactic evidence for the stress and rhythmical patterns. Linguistics 27, 405-436. Crystal, T. H. & House, A.S. (1990) Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech, JASA 88, 101-112. Cutler, Anne (1996) Prosody and the word boundary problem, in Morgan & Demuth (eds.) Signal to Syntax. Dauer, R. M. (1983) Stress timing and syllable timing reanalyzed, Jl. of Phonetics 11, 51-62. Donegan, P. & Stampe, D. (1983) Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure, Parasession on the interplay of phonology, morphology and syntax, Chicago Linguistic Society. Dufter, A. (1995) Ansaetze zu einer rhythmologishen Sprachtypologie. Available from www.coli.uni-sb.de/~fs- coli/procs/dufler.html. Includes an extensive bibliography. Faber, D. (1986) Teaching the rhythms of English: A new theoretical base, IRAL 4, 183-198. Lehiste, I. (1977) Isochrony reconsidered, Jl. of Phonetics 5, 253-263. Nakatani, L. H. & OConnor, K. D. (1981) Prosodic aspects of American English speech rhythm, Phonetica 38, 84-106. Nooteboom, S (1997) Prosody. In Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, Hardcastle & Laver, eds. Pike, K. The Intonation of American English, 1945. Port, R. F., Dalby, J. & ODell, M. (1987) Evidence for mora timing in Japanese, JASA 81, 1574-1585. Trammell, R. L. (1993) English ambi-syllabic consonants and half-closed syllables in language teaching, Language Learning 43, 195-238.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue