Editor for this issue: Anita Huang <anita
linguistlist.org>
C A L L F O R P A P E R S EFFECTS OF MORPHOLOGICAL CASE Workshop to be held at the Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, 28-29 August 1998. Organizers: Helen de Hoop, Olaf Koeneman, Iris Mulders, and Fred Weerman INVITED SPEAKERS: PAUL KIPARSKY, JOAN MALING, ALEC MARANTZ The aim of this workshop is to investigate the effects of morphological case that go beyond its mere phonological characteristics. In the GB model of the eighties, morphological case was considered a spell-out of abstract case. While abstract case is present in all languages, the spell-out is only in a subset. In such a view, the presence of morphological case may help to uncover more abstract features, but in itself it does not have syntactic or semantic effects. This runs counter to observations that the presence/absence of morphological case correlates with the presence/absence of certain syntactic and semantic properties. A case in point is the more or less classical observation that the presence of morphological case is related to the possibility for several types of scrambling. Other approaches have been proposed to incorporate (some of) these effects of morphological case and the idea that parametric differences should be reducable to morphological properties has been defended with varying success. Against this background, the present workshop seeks answers for questions like the following: What is the relation between morphological case and abstract case? What are the distributional, interpretive and phonological effects of the presence of morphological case? The aim of this workshop is to bring together theoretical and empirical considerations on the effects of morphological case. Issues for discussion involve the implications of morphological case for abstract case theory, the difference between structural and inherent case, agreement, word order phenomena, grammaticalization processes, discourse theory, and semantics. We welcome contributions relating to all aspects of linguistics. In particular we are interested in comparative, diachronic and acquisitional evidence that shows that relations between morphological case and other aspects of the grammar do (not) exist. The program will include three invited lectures of experts on the topic of morphological case. The provisional titles are as follows: Paul Kiparsky (Stanford): `Cases as complementizers' Joan Maling (Brandeis): `Morphological case is NOT (always) to blame!' Alec Marantz (MIT): `In defense of "spell-out": why morphological case should indeed have only an indirect reflective relation to the syntax' The workshop has room for 13 selected talks of 35 minutes. Authors should submit 5 copies of an anonymous abstract of no more than 2 pages, one camera-ready copy indicating the author's name and a 3x5" card with the author's name, address, affiliation, e-mail address, phone number, and the title of the paper. We hope to be able to (partially) reimburse all speakers. Please send your abstracts to: Workshop on Morphological Case Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS Trans 10 3512 JK Utrecht The Netherlands The DEADLINE for submission is April 1, 1998. Authors will be notified of acceptance by May 15. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Olaf Koeneman * * Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS * * Trans 10 (room 2.20), 3512 JK Utrecht * * tel. +31 30 253 8304 * * email: koenemanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelet.ruu.nl * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *