Editor for this issue: Brett Churchill <brett
linguistlist.org>
I am very preocupied of the verb TO BE in varieties of Spoken English. I am mostly interested in its "odd" forms and uses in all English Varieties,main pidgins and creoles included. I mainly hope to receive files and not book titles,as it is very difficult to find them in my country. In case anyone wants to help me by sending materials through mail,I'll be mighty much obliged to that person. Thank you, Radu Daniliuc srdanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueassist.cccis.ro Mail address: Ana Ipatescu 10,A,A,9 Suceava 5800,ROMANIA
I hope this query means something to someone besides me. However, I am perfectly willing to accept that I'm just not asking the right question. Your views either way are equally interesting. I'll ask the question first and then add some explicatory comments. Is there any such thing as a nonconfigurational subject prominent language? I assume nonconfigurationality to be indicated by free word order of arguments inside the VP and also by a lack of asymmetries in the movement possibilities for these arguments. In other words, I am assuming the kind of nonconfigurationality ascribed to Hungarian by E. Kiss (1994). As for subject prominence, I am, of course, thinking of the distinction between subject and topic prominent languages. Let me characterise this difference in the following way. A topic prominent language allows any (NP) argument to enter into a predication relationship with the VP while a subject prominent language restricts this relationship to some notion of 'external' or 'most prominent' argument. Thus subject prominent languages have a thematically restricted element of predication, while topic prominent languages impose no such restriction. Thus, under these assumptions, English is a configurational subject prominent language and Hungarian is a nonconfigurational topic prominent language. I might, tentatively, propose that German is a configurational topic prominent language and then there is one logical possibility left. Does such a language exist? Thanks Mark Newson Department of English Linguistics Eotvos Lorand University Budapest newsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueisis.elte.hu