Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
About ten days ago, I posted an inquiry on the Linguist List asking for suggestions for a textbook for an undergraduate course in historical linguistics. I would sincerely like to thank the following people for their very helpful replies: Richard Alderson Paul Peranteau Donn Bayard Marc Picard Ben Brumfield Marc Pierce Joaquim Brandao de Carvalhao Alicia Rodriguez-Alvarez Arild Hestvik Gonzalo Rubio Jaklin Kornfilt Steven Schaufele Jose-Luis Mendivil Giro Jeff Siegel Viola Miglio Herb Stahlke A total of 16 books were mentioned in the replies. A complete list follows, with some comments below. Jean Aitchison, Language Change: Progress or Decay? Cambridge U. Press. Raimo Antilla, An Introduction to Historical Linguistics. Benjamins. Anthony Arlotto, Introduction to Historical Linguistics. University Press of America, 1972. Leonard Bloomfield, Language. Hold Rinehart Winston, 1933. Theodora Bynon, Historical Linguistics. Cambridge U. Press, 1977. Terry Crowley, An Introduction to Historical Linguistics, 3rd ed. Oxford U. Press, 1992. Anthony Fox, Linguistic Reconstruction: and Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford U. Press, 1995. Hans H. Hock, Principles of Historical Linguistics, 2nd ed. Mouton, 1989. Hans H. Hock and Brian D. Joseph, Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Mouton, 1996. Robert Jeffers and Ilse Lehiste, Principles and Methods for Historical Linguistics. MIT Press. Tony Kroch and Don Ringe have a book in preparation. (Title and status unknown.) Roger Lass, Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge U. Press, 1997. Winfred P. Lehmann, Historical Linguistics, 3rd edition. Routledge, 1992. April McMahon, Understanding Language Change. Cambridge U. Press, 1994. R.L. Trask, Historical Linguistics. Arnold 1996. R.L. Trask, Language Change. Routledge, 1994. While many of the respondents offered comments on the books they recommended, it is difficult to compare them because some were based on use in the classroom while others were not; and some comments were extensive but not all. Also, the newer books (1996-1997) may be less familiar than those that have been around for a while. However, the books that were mentioned the most frequently were Crowley,s, Hock's, and Trask's, and Lehmann, and the first three of these were all praised as being excellent. The comments on Lehmann were mixed: some raves, some reservations. And although Hock's book seems to be highly regarded, some respondents thought it might be too advanced or too detailed for an undergraduate class. My thanks again go to everyone who responded. You have made the job of choosing a text much easier. Steve Seegmiller Linguistics Department Montclair State University Upper Montclair, NJ 07043 U.S.A. seegmillermMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuealpha.montclair.edu