Editor for this issue: Anita Huang <anita
linguistlist.org>
Thanks for so many helpful suggestions. French, Spanish, Russian and Polish are not really cases of what I was looking for, since gender is a form of concord rather than an independent marker. The problem yet remains: concord with what? Northern italian dialects with a "io" vs "ia" distinction (M. Donohue) would seem in an intermediate position between concord and an independent morpheme stating sex of the speaker. To put the various contributions in a nutshell, here is what I have been able to bring together so far: 1. Languages that have "men's speech" vs "women's speech". Marked by special morphemes whose function seems to indicate the speaker's sex. Among these, we have Sapir's beautiful and famous description of Yana, and some Arawan languages of the Amazon, Garifuna (Arawak language of Central America), some Siouan languages, and Chukchi and Biloxi (where are these languages spoken, I'm afraid I don't know). Possibly Thai with a final particle (krap for males and ka for females), and Ngala. 2. Languages (Japanese, Thai, Burmese, Vietnamese) where speaker is referred to by terms of kinship, some of these being more likely for men or for women. Any comment on this welcome. Thanks to D.L. Everett, Robert Hagiwara, Stuart Luppescu, Susan Bart, D. Collins, Scott DeLancey, John. P. Boyle, Glen Gordon, Rick McCallister, Karen Chung, Alfred Brothers, Dariusz Cichocki, Mark Donohue, Philip F. Seitz, Earl Herrick, Bernd Spillner, Michael Dunn, Chad D. Nilep and Colin Whiteley for their readiness to cooperate. Please let me know if you wish to know more about how I came to ask the question, I'll do my best to oblige.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue