Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
Does anyone know of a good reference work in Southern (U.S.) dialectology? Specifically, I am looking for a descriptive work on the phonological and syntactic characteristics of Southern dialect(s). Even fairly old references would be welcome if they were done from the standpoint of descriptive linguistics. Of course there are plenty of prosaic and pre-theoretical descriptions of Southern speech, but I'm looking for something rigorous done by a linguist. Works on a specific dialect within what we consider "Southern English" would be welcome, or works on Southern English in general. Thanks! - Tony Wright <twrightMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueaccdvm.accd.edu> St. Philip's College San Antonio, Texas
I want to send a paper for publication to the Journal Of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. I have tried to locate the journal on the web but couldn't find it. Does anyone know its e-mail or mail address? Any help will be highly appreciated. thank you in advance. Regards Azim AssafMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
As is well known, in a sentence like (1) John(i) saw a snake near him(i)/*himself(i). the complex object + PP is usually analyzed as a small clause, so that "him" is free in its GC (Principle B) and coreference with the matrix subject is permitted. It is also well known that some languages (and possibly some speakers of English) use a reflexive in (1). In German, Norwegian and Dutch (at least for some speakers) the reflexive is indeed the only option. My question is: are there any languages that allow ONLY the pronoun in (1)? Note that I'm implicitly assuming that English is not a case in point for various reasons (see Kuno 1987 "Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy" + historical considerations). I'll post a summary if I receive a sufficient number of answers. Thank you in advance. Cristiano Broccias Universita di GenovaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue