Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
I am interested in the relationship between standard and non-standard languages as one of the central themes of my Ph.D. research. I would be very grateful to hear the comments of anyone who has read the book "Language is Power" by John Honey, whether favourable or unfavourable. Essentially Honey charges professional linguists, especially sociolinguists, with the disparagement of standard English as a "class dialect", and holds linguists responsible for the decline of formal grammar teaching in British and American schools leading, in his view, to a serious shortfall in literacy skills among school pupils. I wish to point out that I am trying to gauge the general reaction of linguists to this book; I will not associate names with any opinions expressed to me when I post my summary. Since I am asking for your views on "Language is Power", it is only fair to give you mine. There is much terminological vagueness in the book regarding the definition of "standard English", the "functional efficiency" of languages, the difference between spoken and written norms, and the difference between a language's system and its use. I also find the evidence furnished by Professor Honey in support of the view that sociolinguists are responsible for the decline of formal grammar teaching rather unconvincing. The fact that this decline coincided with the rise of sociolinguistics as a discipline in the 1960s does not prove anything. However, I do agree that students suffer educational disadvantage when they have not been taught how their language works. This is all too evident on observing the ignorance of sentence construction and meta-language among students arriving at university. Professor Honey makes a strong case for the rehabilitation of formal grammar teaching in the school curriculum but unfortunately his arguments are marred by the unproven assertion that professional linguists, by insisting on the principle of linguistic equality, are implicated in a kind of conspiracy to deprive children of a chance to advance themselves through knowledge of standard English. I would also be interested to hear from anyone who knows of any reviews that have appeared on this book. Many thanks. Alan Smith, School of Modern Languages, Dept of French University of Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU U.K. E-mail: alan.smithMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuencl.ac.uk Fax: (0191)2225442
Does anyone have any references to articles discussing duration effects of coarticulation. That is to say the number of segments that any particular aspect of coarticulation might last over. We have invesitigated the effect of post-vocalic /r/ in English on following alveolars and found that, while there is noticeable tongue retraction for a following alveolar this does not last through onto the next alveolar after that (e.g. in /-rts/ clusters and similar). I'm interested in any other work that might have looked at other such durational aspects of coarticulation. I'll post a summary if there is sufficient interest. Thanks! Martin Ball - ------------------- Prof Martin J Ball, PhD Professor of Phonetics & Linguistics University of UlsterMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Would anyone like to give their thoughts on the following terms should we use the term acquisition or extraction when speaking about kowledge or information we want to collect from corpora? What is the difference between them? Thanks for any help. regards oueslati rochdi eric-ensais university of ULP 24 Bd de la victoire 67000 strasbourg France rochdiMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueeric.u-strasbg.fr
Is anyone doing research on the discourse analysis of debating? Does anyone know any useful references or researches that have been done concerning debating as a genre? Please kindly let me know whatever clue you have. The discourse properties of debating is also open for discussion here. I will post a summary later. thanks a lot Charles Lin - ---------------------------------- Charles Chien-Jer Lin Graduate Program in Linguistics, National ChenChi University, TAIWAN email: charleslMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuehp.iis.sinica.edu.tw