Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <seely
linguistlist.org>
Dear Linguists, One of my colleagues sent me a summary of the question of English modals, _needn't to_ and _don't have to_ we posted a few weeks ago. - --------------------------------------------------------- In the middle of January i raised a question about English modals. I asked you to give some examples where _nedn't_ or _don't have to_ is used in the epistemic sense, as in: (1) "lok at those tracks. That must be a dog." "It needn't / doesn't have to be--It could be a fox. Soon after that I got 6 e-mails. Thank you for answering my question. I would express my sincere thanks to the following people who supplied useful data: firsten1Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueicanect.net (Richard Firsten) Carl.Mills
UC.Edu(Carl Mills) ewb2
cornell.edu (E. Wayles Browne) cwhiteley
tyco.geis.com(Colin Whiteley) Pierre Busuttil <pierre.busuttil
univ-pau.fr> geoffs
cogs.susx.ac.uk (Geoffrey Sampson) Pierre Busttil has given me excerpts from his database. Gerffrey Sampson has also given me a lot of examples from the LOB corpus. Gisle Anderson has checked with his own data--The Bergen Corpus of London Teenage Language. Wales Browne has given me a lot of examples from his own correspondence. All of these has been a great help. Kenji Kashino, Osaka Shoin Women's University, Japan - -------------------------------------------------------- Best Wishes, Hiroaki Tanaka Associate Professor, 1-1, Minamijousanjima-cho, Tokushima, 770, Japan Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Tokushima University, Japan hiro-t
ias.tokushima-u.ac.jp