Editor for this issue: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar <aristar
linguistlist.org>
CALL FOR PAPERS "LANGUAGE ALIVE linguistics for the rest of us" AN EDITED VOLUME Rebecca S. Wheeler rswheelerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecc.weber.edu DEADLINES: ABSTRACT: May 1, 1997 PAPER: February 1, 1998 AUDIENCES: **Primary**: English & English Education faculty making curriculum decisions about linguistics offerings in undergraduate colleges & universities. **Secondary**: Undergraduate students in English & English Education. **Tertiary**: The educated lay public, linguists in English departments. SEEKING CONTRIBUTIONS AS FOLLOWS: * five 2500 word papers on 1. Why traditional grammar doesn't cut it 2. Language policy in America 3. Spoken language vs. written language 4. Endangered languages 5. Language and gender * 750 - 1,200 word nuggets on assorted topics, as fit into or enhance the existing layout. INVITED CONTRIBUTORS: (nota bene: many titles are dramatizations by the editor) I. English where, English how? **World Englishes, language change** David CRYSTAL: 'Out of left field? That's not cricket: The past, present, and (global) future of English language use. **Prescriptivism unseated** Steven PINKER: The Language Mavens **Dialects and their implications** Salikoko MUFWENE: Language contact yields language variety: Ebonics, dialect of the usual sort. Walt WOLFRAM: Dialect awareness for our children Johanna RUBBA: Language, power and prestige in the classroom **Language Policy** __??: Endangered languages __??: Language policies in America II. Beyond grammar encounters of the traditional kind ??___: Why traditional grammar doesn't cut it Cari SPRING: Beyond grammar workbooks to grammar discovery Dick HUDSON: Exploring ambiguity from K to 12. III. The written word, the spoken word **Language and literacy** Tom GIVON: Scouting the spectrum of literacy **Language in writing** Victor RASKIN: Writing Well in an Unknown Language: Linguistics and composition in an English department **Language in literature** Mark TURNER: Creativity Suzette Haden ELGIN: Martian plains, Elvish, and 'To be or not to be' in Klingon Victor RASKIN: Laughing At or Laughing With: The Linguistics of Humor and Humor in Literature **Spoken vs. written languge** ??___: Spoken language vs. written language **Dictionaries & thesauri** Rebecca WHEELER: "The dictionary says... " IV. Language in social settings **Language and Gender** ??___. Language and gender V. Language in the public view **Language in Politics** George LAKOFF: Metaphor in politics, why conservatives leave liberals in the dust **Language and the Law** Judith LEVI: Guilt or innocence, truth & lies: what language tells us in the courtroom __________________ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROBLEM: The insights of linguistics, remaining largely sequestered in the halls of technical academia, have not generally made it to the lay public. The consequences of the public's ignorance of linguistics range from damaging public policies (the English Only movement), and uninformed public reaction (the recent Ebonics debate), to the continued perpetration of linguistic falsehoods in the public schools, and the threatening of university linguistics programs around the country, just to name a few. Recent works directed to the lay public are beginning to address this lacuna. For example, readers have been well served by Deborah Tannen's "You Just Don't Understand", and "Talking from 9 to 5", Steve Pinker's "Language Instinct" and Ray Jackendoff's"Patterns in the Mind". The documentaries "The Story of English" and "American Tongues", among others, have furthered the public's awareness of matters linguistic. Within the university or college environment, we find another linguistically lay public. That's the English Departments. Like the broader American public, the English literature and writing faculty are often unfamiliar with the insights and contributions of linguistics. More perniciously, English faculty, alienated by what they perceive as a uselessly technical and theory-bound field, often relegate Linguistics to a dark corner in the English curriculum. Yet, since most colleges and universities in the US do not have separate linguistics programs or departments, it is largely within the English Departments that the insights of linguistics will be taught if they're to be taught at all. The consequence of this English department shunning of linguistics is that we continue to raise generations of students who emerge from college without an informed view of the nature of language and its function in society. Some graduates go on to perpetuate uninformed views as they teach in our primary and secondary schools while others enter public life promote language policies blind to the facts of language. PURPOSE: The purpose of this collection is twofold: (i) to demonstrate that linguistics is a key component within an undergraduate English curriculum by showing that linguistics sheds interesting light on things that English and English Education departments care about, and (ii) to make the insights of our field accessible to a broad readership (faculty, undergraduates, lay public). MAKING THE ARGUMENT: We suggest that a graduate of an English department (majoring in English or the teaching of English) should know what language is and what it isn't; they should know its workings and its playings. This understanding should reap benefits both for our society and for the graduates themselves. First, a graduate in English or English Teaching who is largely language-myth free, should be able to understand and promote linguistically informed social policies. Second, people specializing in English should be able to __do more and understand more__ in contexts where language pertains (literature, language in the school classroom, literature, conversation, advertising, politics, popular music, etc.) PROPOSED BOOK: This collection of papers will offer a linguistically informed discussion of topics interesting and relevant to the target audiences. The intent is to spark interest in linguistics as a useful tool in today's world, both in and outside academia. ***This book does not attempt to directly teach or inform about linguistics. It is not a theoretical treatise. Instead, we will approach our subject by first presenting conundra, scenarios, etc. that intrinsically grab the attention of the audience, and then by demonstrating how linguistics sheds interesting light on these phenomena. In other words, with a reluctant audience shine the beam in through the side door.*** Contributions should include a section citing further readings, and an appendix offering extracts from or suggestions for SYLLABI on the topic under discussion. A PUBLISHER: Praeger will produce this work. SUBMISSIONS: If you'd like to contribute to this work, (a) please jot me me a quick e-note signalling your interest in this project (b) please submit an abstract (200/500 words for 750/2500 wd. articles, respectively) to me at rswheeler
cc.weber.edu, or by snail mail to Rebecca S. Wheeler Department of English Weber State University Ogden, Utah 84408-1201. Papers should be either not previously published, or substantially changed from earlier published versions. SCHEDULE: Abstract submission deadline: May 1, 1997 Accepted papers submitted: February 1, 1998 Projected publication: February 1999 For more information, email me at rswheeler
cc.weber.edu cheers, Rebecca S. Wheeler
Announcing a call for papers and invitation to participate in ITELL, a conference on Instructional Technology in English Language Learning, 11 - 13 September 1997. The conference is jointly organised by THE DIVISION OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE & APPLIED LINGUISTICS, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION, NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, Singapore and THE SOCIETY FOR READING AND LITERACY, Singapore. Papers, workshops and displays may relate to the following broad areas within the conference theme: 1. Innovative developments in software for teaching and learning language skills 2. Innovative developments in hardware for working with language 3. Innovative uses of existing materials and hardware for teaching and learning language skills 4. Software evaluation and selection and software production 5. Using the Internet for language learning and teaching 6. Implications of IT for the curriculum in language study 7. Implications of IT for methodology in language teaching 8. IT and the design and function of physical space in schools 9. Language labs, portable computers or what? - decision making in equipment purchases 10. Research in IT and language learning and teaching 11. Changing teachers' attitudes to accept and use technology A 150-250 word abstract and a 50-word biodata should be sent to the address below no later than 15 May 1997. Please provide the abstract and biodata in electronic form, either on diskette (3.5"). Please also provide a hard copy and specify the platform (IBM or Macintosh) and format (e.g. MSWord, Word Perfect) of the files. Please make sure that your diskettes are virus-free!!! Send your abstract and biodata to: The Organising Committee, c/o Ms Koshu Lulla, Tele-Temps Pte Ltd, 1002 Toa Payoh Industrial Park #06-1475, Singapore 319074 Telephone: (65) 250 7700 Fax: (65) 253 2228 E-mail: teletempMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuepacific.net.sg For registration and further information, you may also contact the organising committee at the above addresses.