Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <seely
linguistlist.org>
I don't know, it might have been that Chris Whassername out of "Brass Eye", but the bloke on the other end of the phone sounded kosher. He claimed to be a researcher for one of the British government's bankbencher MPs with a special interest in digital television. Could I give an opinion on what academics thought about the possibility? I gave him my standard song on corpus linguistics and said I'd ask a few experts around the world... Here's the scoop. Everyone knows the V-chip is a disaster. It doesn't work, and we didn't invent it anyway. But there's a lot of votes in controlling the awful (perceived) excesses of digital television. We certainly couldn't unleash all that sex and violence on the British public without some sort of control, now could we. But setting up panels and censorship boards and pre-vetting of TV is just too expensive, not to say deeply unpopular, to contemplate. So surely some boffins must have come up with a piece of computer software which could vet the content of TV programmes for us? Come again? Well, if you had all the scripts on computer disks, you could run them through a program which would calculate some kind of content descriptor, some kind of rating. Then parents could program their TVs to block out any programmes with certain kinds of descriptor or rating, right? Some kind of automatic categorization, topic identification, that kind of thing. Is no-one doing research on that sort of text analysis? Specifically as applied to broadcasting? Has anyone tried to apply automatic content identification methods to this kind of domain? I'll be glad to digest any suggestions and pass them on to our man in Whitehall. Suggestions relating to the question asked, that is. Comments about the state of British politics in general, and the current government in particular, should be sent to a more appropriate forum. And if there's any research funding in this, just remember, I saw him first. Lou Burnard >From the Laptop at Burnard TowersMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I would like to know if anyone has any information on sources of funding for non-US/Canadian citizens to do postdoctoral research in the US or Canada. I've written to the Fulbright Commission, but I wondered whether there were any other possibilities I could chase up. I am looking at doing research in one of two areas - the role of the prosodic hierarchy in Optimality Theory, and the other is how Optimality Theory deals with historical language change. Thank you for any information. John Hutton mfcstjhMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefs1.art.man.ac.uk Department of English, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,
Sorry if you have already got this message via "Italian Studies"! I am looking for Italian verbs ending in -acchiare, -icchiare or -ucchiare. My special interest is focused on verbs of this type which cannot be found in the dictionaries. If anyone remembers such a nonce formation of his own or of someone else, eg. "veducchaire" (from "vedere") or "sciacchaire" (from "sciare"), please let me know. Thanks a lot Elmar Schafroth, University of Augsburg Dr. Elmar Schafroth c/o Romanische Sprachwissenschaft Universitaet Augsburg Universitaetsstr. 10 D-86135 AUGSBURG Tel.: (0821) 598-5738 Fax.: (0821) 598-5501Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Dear linguists, I am developing my PhD thesis on stylistic functions of syntactical repetitions used in belle-letters, and I am interested in getting in contact with people working on this subject. Also, I'm looking for the related Internet resources. Any help is appreciated Sveta ssyzMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuetco.infonet.com PS Please e-mail privately, I'm not a member of the list.