Editor for this issue: Susan Robinson <sue
linguistlist.org>
New book- Phonetics/Phonology Jun, Sun-Ah; The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody: Intonational Phonology and Prosodic Structure; 0-8153-2558-4; cloth; 264 pages; $65; Garland Publishing Korean speech rhythms differ in interesting ways from those of English, especially in the role of intonationally defined prosodic groupings, which influence the pronunciation of consonants and vowels as profoundly as does stress in English. This account of Korean intonational rhythms is based on experiments that suggest a hierarchy of intonationally defined groupings, which exert different influences on the consonants and vowels at their edges. For example, the smaller accentual phrase affects the pronunciation of a class of consonants which are voiceless (sounding like Spanish "p" or "ch") in phrase-initial position, but become voiced (like English "b" or "j") in phrase-medial position. The larger intonational phrase also affects these consonants by making exceptions to the generalization that they will be pronounced as nasals (like French "m" or "gn") when they occur before another nasal. Other experiments show that speakers vary the intonational groupings that they assign to any string of words, in ways that reflect influence from many other aspects of the utterance including overall speech tempo, the words' syntactic structure and relative predictability, and the signalling of narrow focus of attention on any particular word. Significantly, the influence of focus of attention was paramount, contrary to many current linguistic theories which propose syntactic structure as the primary determinant of prosodic rhythms. E-mail: infoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuegarland.com
New book-Psycholinguistics Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria; The Prefunctional Stage of First Language Acquisition: A Crosslinguistic Study; 0-8153-2561-4; cloth; 266 pages; $59; Garland Publishing This book accounts for the early stages of first language acquisition within the Principles and Parameters framework. The main arguments concern the nature of early grammars in relation to the constraints that Universal Grammar imposes on them and in relation to the lack of parameterisation which, in turn, is based on the absence of the categories responsible for crosslinguistic variation, namely the set of functional categories. The argument regarding the absence of parameterisation gives rise to important predictions insofar as similarities across languages at the early stage of development are concerned. Accordingly, the theory is tested against acquisition data from a number of languages: English, French , Greek, German, Spanish, and Irish. E-mail: infoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuegarland.com