Editor for this issue: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar <aristar
linguistlist.org>
Dear List Members: As some of you have no doubt already learned, LINGUIST is experiencing a software problem which is harming our ability to distribute mail effectively to the linguistic community. Consequently, we are posting this explanation and a request for your patience. We have been in place at Texas A&M University for the last seven years, and this university has generously allowed its facilities to be used to distribute our LINGUIST mail. In January of this year, however, because of budgetary constraints, it was decided to move all lists at Texas A&M to a new machine. This new machine proved incapable of handling the volume of mail which LINGUIST typically produces, and as a result, every so often, some LINGUIST messages sent to a few subscribers have no contents when they are received. We should note, parenthetically, that this problem is not affecting those who read LINGUIST on the Web: all our issues are available in full at any of our Web sites. We've been patiently awaiting a solution to this problem, but have now begun to fear that a solution may not be forthcoming. Because of this, we've come to a reluctant conclusion: we may have to move LINGUIST to another site. Now, we have two choices in this situation. We could set up our own mail-delivery system on our own, private machine. But this would entail our buying a fast Pentium-based machine with a great deal of memory, and the software licenses for the operating system and the mail-delivery system: Windows NT, Listserv, and a mail-transfer program called LSMTP. This would probably cost us about $8000 in all; and, unfortunately, as you are probably aware, one thing LINGUIST does not have is money. Our second option is to move to a site at another university or company. At the moment, we are investigating this possibility. If you feel that a site you know if would be willing to give us space and capacity, we'd be very glad to hear from you. We'll keep you informed as things progress. And if any of you, our subscribers, have suggestions, we would be happy to hear them. Anthony, Helen and DanielMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue