Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <ann
linguistlist.org>
Does anyone know of work done to estimate the actual size of the English lexicon or the lexicons of any other languages? We are interested in determining the relative sizes of lexicons cross-linguistically and whether this has a psychological impact, in terms of word-recognition and retrieval times (as a function of frequency, which may be affected by size of encountered lexicon). In addition to estimates of total size of lexicon for a given language, we would like to discover what subset of the lexicon speakers actually encounter. This subset will then be compared cross-linguistically and intraculturally. Thus, we are also looking for estimates of vocab size and word frequency counts for language encountered in publications (New York Times vs People, for example), in primary and secondary school texts, etc. If you know of anything at all related to these issues, please send sources to the following address. Thank you! Laura Snow lsnowMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueu.washington.edu
I'm a graduate assistant for a professor in Written Business Communication. She is interested in finding out if there are any grammar checkers for students whose first language isn't English. Grammatik is fine but that's for students whose first language is English. Some of the students in her class have an Asian language for their first language. We would appreciate any help that you could give. yours truly, Steven-spangMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecsulb.edu Dr. J.W. Gilsdorf-gilsdorf
csulb.edu
Dear Colleagues, Recent browsing in some general texts has made me aware that there are or have been recently some questions raised about certain putative affiliations amongst certain languages on the African continent. Not being an Africanist, this is in no way an area i am particularly knowledgeable about, but i have hopes someday of teaching a seminar in which students are called upon to examine critically the literature arguing pro & con certain hypotheses in the field of historical linguistics, and i would therefore like some references to good discussions in the literature on the following topics: 1. There is presumably no question that all the so-called `Cushitic' languages are members of the Afro-Asiatic family. But do they constitute a well-defined sub-family, or are they merely a `miscellaneous' category? 2. Are the so-called `Nilo-Saharan' languages a well-defined glosso- genetic family or merely a geographically-defined group? 3. Ditto the `Khoisan' languages. Thanks for any suggestions wrt literature on these issues. If there is sufficient interest, i'll post a summary on LINGUIST. Best, Steven - ------------------- Dr. Steven Schaufele 712 West Washington Urbana, IL 61801 217-344-8240 fcoswsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueprairienet.org http://www.prairienet.org/~fcosws/homepage.html **** O syntagmata linguarum liberemini humanarum! *** *** Nihil vestris privari nisi obicibus potestis! ***