Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <seely
linguistlist.org>
I'm working on a PhD on Swedish learners' errors in English compositions and I'm trying to find an article by J. Hendrickson (1979) "Systematic Correlation and Analysis of Composition Errors" in Hendrickson , 1979 pp 25-43. It seems this article is part of a collection of papers edited (?) by Hendrickson called "Error Analysis and Correction in Language Teaching" in Seameo Regional Language Centre Occasional Papers # 10, 1979 (Singapore). I've tried our library but they just can't help me. Is there anyone out there who knows about this article and perhaps where I could get hold of a copy? Please e-mail me directly on Pia.KohlmyrMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueeng.gu.se Thanks in advance... Pia Kohlmyr Mrs Pia Kohlmyr (PhD student) Phone: Int +46 (0)31 773 17 67 Gothenburg University E-mail: Pia.Kohlmyr
eng.gu.se Department of English Fax: Int +46 (0)31 773 47 26 S-412 98 Gothenburg Sweden
I'm hoping someone can clarify the concept of ontological metaphor. After reading Chapter 6 in METAPHORS WE LIVE BY, Lakoff and Johnson, I don't feel confident in identifying such metaphor in discourse. Two examples they give are: (1) He went to New York to SEEK FAME AND FORTUNE. (2) INFLATION IS LOWERING our quality of living. I would guess and say that these are ontological metaphors based on the idea that "fame and fortune" and "inflation" don't have definite boundaries as physical entities; hence, they are classified as ontological metaphors. Is my guess correct? I would greatly appreciate your comments. Dean Bush, deanbushMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuedigitalexp.com
I am currently transcribing a large corpus of naturally occurring conversational English second language data by Chinese/ English bilingual adults. We are aiming to carry out an analysis of salient linguistic features at lexico-semantic and morpho-syntactic levels which would allow comparisons between individual speakers and speaker groups. Could anybody recommend a manageable (standardised) syntactic proficiency measure that can be used to analyse such data? Many thanks in advance, Christine Raschka Department of Speech, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU UK Email: christine.raschkaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuenewcastle.ac.uk