Editor for this issue: Susan Robinson <sue
linguistlist.org>
Hello! I'm looking for materials regarding portuguese prosody/intonation. If you have any information, please, contact me. Thank you, Miguel OliveiraMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Dear fellow TESLers: I've just learned that people of the North Solomons Province of New Guinea have different systems for counting each of the following (among other): people, four-footed animals, fish, birds, months, days. All go only up to four. This is only one system that is quite different from the Western counting system. Does anyone have an explanation for only counting these things up to four, and also, why there are only four days and months? Thanks for your comments! Dean Bush, dean bushMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuedigitalexp.com FSU, Tallahassee, FL
Dear Linguist Listers, I am an M. Phil. student working on Right Dislocation (RD) in Cantonese (a dialect of Chinese spoken in Guangdong province or Hong Kong). I would like to invite observations in other languages from listers. Before asking the questions, I would like to briefly tell you the kind of phenomena I have in mind. In colloquial speech, it is often possible to dislocate elements in a sentence to the final position, even after the Sentence Final Particle (SFP). It is sometimes considered to be afterthought or a performance error and is rejected in writing. Here are some Cantonese RD examples. (1) ngo gammaan wui heoi tai hei go-wo [canonical version] I tonight will go see movie SFP=09 "I will go to the movie tonight." (1') ngo heoi tai hei go-wo gammaan wui [RD version] I go see movie SFP tonight will=09 "I will go to the movie tonight." [NB: "gammaan wui" dislocated] Here is the basic characterisation of Right Dislocation. - One or more elements are dislocated out of their canonical position to the end of sentence. In some cases, the dislocated part is coreferential with a pronoun in the sentence. I expect genuine RD can dislocate not just things like "I think", "I guess", "perhaps", "actually", etc. - Often but not necessary, the initial part of a RD sentece bears some important information the speaker chooses to say first. The dislocated part conveys information presupposed/accessible/ inferrable from the immediate context. - Generally the dislocated part is unstressed. Comparable phenomena have been reported in other languages as well. They include Mandarin Chinese (Lu 1980), French (Ashby 1988; Lambrecht 1981), Tamil (Herring 1994), and Catalan (Vallduv=ED 1992). (2) Il-attend devant la porte, le gar=E7on. Lambrecht (1981) (3) El ganivet l 'hi ficarem, al calaix. Vallduv=ED (1995) the knife OBJ-LOC we will put in the drawer Geluykens (1994) also argues that English RD is a conversational repair, more like a genuine afterthought, e.g. "He is a stupid guy, John." If he is correct, I would consider English RD not the kind of RD I have been considering. *Questions* a. Do any of the languages (esp. in colloquial form) you know of exhibit RD? If YES, could you give a brief description of it, such as basic syntactic properties and function? The characterization of RD above is tentative. If RD in your case does not pattern squarely with it, I would still like to know it. If NO, I still like to know what languages do not permit RD. b. What can be dislocated? Cantonese and Mandarin allow dislocation of a wide variety of categories, e.g. Subj./Accusative Obj. NP, modals, most adverbs, and some others. However, French, Catalan, and Tamil are reported to be rather limited in this aspect, allowing NP and PP. Please correct me if I am wrong. I am particularly interested in the dislocation of modal and adverbs, if any, as they are relatively more fixed in position. c. Do you know any references to this kind of phenomenon in any language? Sorry for the long message. I will post a summary of your responses. Thanks a lot in advance. Lawrence Cheung Department of English, Chinese University of Hong Kong E-mail: ylcheungMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuePOBoxes.com