Editor for this issue: Susan Robinson <sue
linguistlist.org>
Hello all, I am beginning a sociolinguistics doctorate in the Science of Language at a Paris intitute. I am studying virtual communities, right now IRC exchanges, and would like some input on several ideas that I have. If you have seen any articles or books (unlikely) based on these subjects or if you know someone doing similar research could you pass on this information? 1) Analysing the difference between spoken (face to face conversation), written (correspondance, e-mail or type-written letters) and synchronically written texts (IRC, MUDs, MOOs). 2) Establishing a sense of presence in a virtual community. Thanks for any comments or pointers. Hillary Bays <Hillary.BaysMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuedlv.univ-evry.fr> 258 bis rue de Paris 93100 Montreuil, FRANCE
I'd appreciate some data to bear on a small issue in the morphology of endocentric noun compounds. Many languages have a general associative case-form, often with a primary meaning of POSSESSIVE. English permits the use of this case of the non-head noun in noun-noun compounds, or at least appears to: menswear, yachtsman, dogsbody. Does anyone know of a language with a richer system of case which permits the use of an overtly-marked case other than the associative in similar compounds? What I am looking for involves words such as Latin _paterfamilias_ appears to be, namely a word with a non-head form in the accusative. (It is, in fact, an archaic genitive (associative).) I'll post a summary if anything interesting emerges, such as obligatory use of the allative in Blobbo. Richard Coates School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences University of Sussex Brighton BN1 9QH UK richardcMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecogs.susx.ac.uk Tel.: +44 (0)1273 678522 Fax: +44 (0)1273 671320
Hi, does anyone know where I can get a copy of the guidelines for the ACTFL OPI for (Mandarin) Chinese? I believe they contain more specific requirements/objectives than those for English. If anyone can help, it'd be much appreciated. Thanks, Paul Woods, Uni of Sheffield.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue