Editor for this issue: Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba
linguistlist.org>
SEMANTICS Eugene Rohrbaugh; Scalar Interpretation in Deontic Speech Acts 0-8153-2885-0, cloth; 178 pages, $46; Garland Publishing; Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics This study examines the predictive success of various formal framework s for modeling the meanings of scalar terms in commands and permissions. A survey of previous works by Lewis, Kamp, Stalnaker, and Merin introduce s three problems for deontic modeling: spurious permission, free choice p ermission, and full choice conjunction. Although only the last of these h as been observed as a problem outside of the deontic realm, evidence in t his study suggests that all three are problematic in the epistemic realm as well, making their solution more crucial. The literature on scalar interpretation is reviewed, including the wor ks of Grice, Horn, Fauconnier, and Hirschberg. The notions of scalar enta ilment and scalar implicature are introduced and their applicability to c ommands and permissions considered. Since these accounts focus primarily on assertions, they say little about the interpretation of scalar terms i n commands and permissions, and several problems specific to deontic cont exts remain. At the root of these problems is the choice of possible worlds as theo retic primitives. Alternative frameworks based on notions more fine-grain ed than possible worlds are able to more successfully predict the entailm ents and implications of deontic utterances having scalar terms. This boo k explores ways to model scalar meaning in frameworks based on situations , states, events, and eventualities, discussing the relative merits of ea ch and indicating problems that remain. (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1995; revised wit h new introduction, bibliography, and index; 8 tables; 35 diagrams) E-mail: infoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuegarland.com