Editor for this issue: Susan Robinson <sue
linguistlist.org>
hello all-- a student of mine is looking for data on apologies in british english done in the CCSARP (cross-cultural speech act realization project) method. she needs a full set of statistics from discourse completion tests in order to compare it to the data she has for baganda speakers of english as a second language. we haven't been able to find anything in the CCSARP literature that provides these figures, but that certainly doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. any help would be greatly appreciated. lynne murphy - ------------------------------------------------------------------ M. Lynne Murphy, Senior Lecturer 104lynMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuemuse.arts.wits.ac.za Department of Linguistics phone: +27-11-716-2340 University of the Witwatersrand fax: +27-11-716-4199 Johannesburg 2050 SOUTH AFRICA
I'd be grateful for any useful references on the grammatical relation 'Object', and the properties of NP's said to bear that relation. 'Thanks in advance': I'll post a summary of reponses. Adrian Adrian Clynes aclynesMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueubd.edu.bn Dept of English & Applied Linguistics Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei
Colleagues: Can anyone help in aiding a colleague in Bangladesh? I have received a message from an ELT professional at Dhaka University whom I had the pleasure to meet during a trip there in January of this year. Below is an excerpt from his message: BEGIN QUOTE I am investigating the problems faced by Bangladeshi learners in acquiring the English Tense-Aspect system. English is taught as a foreign language in Bangladesh and using the English Tense-Aspect system appropriately and correctly is difficult for Bangladeshi learners. The purpose of my study is to identify which forms and their functions cause problems and also the nature and causes of these problems. I am looking for suggestions and references with regard to the following: 1. Defining the point of acquisition: Larsen-Freeman and Long (1991:40-41) in their Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research (New York & London: Longman) deal with the matter. They refer to Cazden (1968, The Acquisition of noun and verb inflections, Child Development, 39, 433-448) and Hakuta (1974, A preliminary report on the development of grammatical morphemes in a Japanese girl learning English as a second language, Working Papers on Bilingualism, 3, 18-43) - who accept 90% suppliance of correct grammatical forms in obligatory contexts as evidence for successful acquisition. But how far can I use percentages for acquisition of a grammatical form or its function? A more rational approach would perhaps be to see if a learner or group of learners are able to use a form-function relationship consistently in different tasks over time. Have there been any recent studies in this matter? What are the references? 2. Defining a learning difficulty or a learning problem: I need to explain what constitutes a 'learning difficulty' and refer to psycholinguistic studies in relation to the concept of difficulty in language learning. I have identified the following five references: A) Higa, M. 1966. The psycholinguistic concept of 'difficulty' and the teaching of foreign language vocabulary. Language Learning, 16, 167-179. B) Kellerman, E. 1979. The problem with difficulty. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 4, 1, 27- 48. C) Nickel, G. 1971. Problems of learners' difficulties in foreign language acquisition. IRAL, 9, 3, 219-227. D) Nickel, G. 1971. Variables in a hierarchy of difficulty. Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 4, 185-194. E) Tran-Thi-Chau. 1975. Error analysis, contrastive analysis and students' perception: a study of difficulty in second language learning. IRAL, 13, 2, 119-143. I don't know about any recent contributions to the issue. I'd be grateful if you could send me a list of recent references in this matter or photocopies of the same. END QUOTE Request 1: If anyone has good info/references for his point #1 (defining point of acq), please send them to me and I will forward. Request 2: If anyone has recent references on "difficulty," please send to me and I will then track them down on my end and forward. Request 3: I have been able to obtain copies of four of the (older) references he cited for "difficulty." Does anyone have the following article on their shelves that they could copy and send to me (mail or fax)? I have not been able to locate a copy locally (neither at Lib of Congress nor at other major university near me): - Nickel, G. 1971. Variables in a hierarchy of difficulty. Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 4, 185-194. (This is the Hawaii WPL, I think). Please reply off-list anyone who could help. I will summarize/post anything that seems relevant to the list. And thanks very much in advance. Access to materials, especially current ones, is difficult in Bangladesh. Tim Robinson trobinsoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueusia.gov