Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <ann
linguistlist.org>
I was wondering whether anyone knew whether unergatives (S=A) or unaccusatives (S=O) are predominant among ambivalent verbs in particular languages. For example, all transitive roots in Tzotzil are ambivalent, belonging to the unaccusative (S=O) type (with one unergative (S=A) exception). Is this typical or atypical? Can anyone recommend some references on this topic? I will post a summary. Regards, Stuart Robinson - Stuart Robinson <Stuart.RobinsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueanu.edu.au> Linguistics Department Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200
I am trying to find connectionist models of pronoun interpretation and would be very glad to hear about any examples you may know of. It would also be very helpful to know whether a given model computes the pronoun-antecedent relation on the spot or whether it retrieves a pre-stored relation from memory. If you send responses to me, I will summarise them for the list. Thanks in advance. Rosemary StevensonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
>From Luke Yates Centre for Linguistics University of Western Australia *** NULL ANAPHORA IN CLASSICAL LATIN *** I'm examining null anaphora in Classical Latin for my Honours thesis at the University of Western Australia. I'll be drawing data from the Classical Latin corpus of Julius Caesar ( i.e. the 'Gallic' and 'Civil Wars' ) My study will include but not be restricted to null subjects. I'm particularly interested in the morpho-syntactic status of Latin verbal inflections and null arguments and the relationship between them. The role of inflectional affixes in identification and licensing within Latin is highly relevant. I would be very grateful for pointers to resources or contacts re: null anaphora in Latin. Replies can be sent to me via Alan Dench at: adenchMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecyllene.uwa.edu.au and I will post a summary of responses. Thank you, Luke Yates