Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <ann
linguistlist.org>
Forwarded message - --------------- I have recently received, by a rather roundabout route, just a few of the contributions to this discussion. I don't, therefore, know everything that has been said. I teach Advanced Level English Language (as well as a separate course in English Literature) at a sixth form college - i.e. to students aged 16+. They come to us from 80+ different schools, so have a wide range of previous educational experience. Far from arriving having been taught to avoid splitting infinitives and ending sentences with prepositions, most arrive having never been taught what infinitives and prepositions are. They lack the `reasonably precise vocabulary for analysis' referred to by Larry Rosenwald in his contribution of 5 June. I can teach them the terminology from scratch, but find that it does not `bed down' as it would have done if they had been familiar with basic grammatical concepts from a much earlier age. A few days ago, I spent a whole lesson teaching my students to distinguish between active and passive verbs (something which I myself could have done easily at the age of 12, thanks to the `old-fashioned' grammar teaching which I received) because I wanted them to try an old exam question where the knowledge would have helped them to see which of two texts would have been harder for young children to read. I ended up nursing them through the.exercise, doing much of the work for them. In the next lesson, I gave them another old exam question with extracts from `Animal Farm' to analyse in the light of Orwell's own suggestion (amongst others) that one should prefer the active to the passive. Many of the students took so long to decide which verbs were active and which passive that they had no time to write an analysis. A recurring problem on the course is that students struggle with higher-order analysis because they lack lower-order skills. Teachers in the past at least had the grace to teach children how to recognise infinitives and prepositions: they described before they prescribed or proscribed. Now, however, most teachers seem so anxious to avoid prescription and proscription that they avoid even description. Like Larry Rosenwald, I think that the prescriptivist/descriptivist dichotomy has been taken too far. Jennifer Chew - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- End of forwarded message - ----------------------Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue