Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <ann
linguistlist.org>
African-American Vernacular (or Ebonics): One of my students, Sonja Trent, is doing a dissertation that involves experimental work (similar to Berko-Gleason's) on the acquisition of syntactic and morphological rules by native speakers of AAV. We would appreciate any references to grammars (or pieces of grammars) of AAV, especially concerning pluralizations, tense markers, mass nouns vs count nouns, or any morpho-phonemic rules that differ from "standard" American English. We will be happy to do a summary if there is interest in such. Please reply to JenkinsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueluna.cas.usf.edu Thanks for your help. James J. Jenkins Psychology Department University of South Florida Tampa, FL 33620-8200 (813) 974-0486
I. FACTS Partial wh-movement, that is, wh-movement to a position that is below the one corresponding to the scope of the wh-phrase can be found in various forms in natural languages: 1. Without a scope marker, as in BahasaIndonesia Bill tahu siapa yang Tom cintai Bill knows who FOC Tom loves "who does Bill know that Tom loves"? (from Saddy 1992) 2. In a construction in which the scope of the partially moved wh-phrase is determined by another wh-phrase, as in Romani: ko vakerja kaj o Demiri khelja who said where the Demir danced "who said that Demir danced where" (from McDaniel 1989) 3. In a construction in which scope is marked by the insertion of a scope marker meaning "what" in other constructions, as in German: was glaubst Du wen sie liebt what believe you who she loves "who do you believe that she loves?" 4. In a language employing the wh-in-situ strategy, scope marking by WHAT may be found in the absense of partial movement, as in Hindi Siitaa-ne kyaa socaa ki ravii-ne kis-ko dekhaa Sita-erg what thought that Ravi-erg who saw "who did Sita think that Ravi saw?" (from Mahajan 1995) II. QUERY Which languages allow "partial movement" in the sense implicitly defined above, i.e. which languages have one of the construction types 1-4. Here is what I know 1. Bahasa Indonesia, Malay, Kikuyu 2. Romani, perhaps German 3. German, Hungarian, Frisian, Iraqi Arabic 4. Hindi, Iraqi Arabic Please respond to: fanselowMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuerz.uni-potsdam.de (Gisbert Fanselow, Lx, University of Potsdam)
I have a query regarding linguistics in the foreign language classroom. Which key elements of linguistics seem to be the most useful for foreign language students in entry level language classes? I don't mean linguistics instead of practice in the target language ... nor having to memorize linguistic terminology for the sake of a grade. But on a practical note, which elements in the field of linguistics (when synopsized) would actually benefit students the most? Have any of you seen any studies in this area? Thanks, Alysse Rasmussen Instructor, LSCCMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue