Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <ann
linguistlist.org>
We are working on two articles for the Handbook of Typology: 1) deictic localization (expressions like "here", "there", "left", "downstairs" etc.), 2) local cases, Of course, we already took notice of basic texts about these problems, but if anyone has any additional information of the following kind, please let us know: a) exotic phenomena in these fields, b) interesting material from lesser known languages, c) studies that are of special interest, but may pass unnoticed, d) latest or forthcoming publications (1997). Please, contact us directly (esp. if you work in one of these fields yourself or if you have interesting findings or material). Martin Haase Matthias Deja - - mdejaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de
Dear LINGUISTs, I've done a pretty thorough reveiw of the psycholinguistic literature on lexical ambiguity, but I'm left with a question that doesn't seem to be addressed directly in any of the empirical studies I've read. It's this: if an ambiguous word has a strongly dominant sense, is that sense most likely to be the one actually selected in neutral contexts? Of course the intuitive answer seems obivously to be "yes," but I haven't found any formal studies affirming this, as most studies do not explicitly relate dominance bias or strength of activation with the processes of sense selection. Two more general questions: have the findings of Tabossi (refs. below) pretty much spelled an end to a purely modularist view of lexial processing? And finally, to what extent are connectionist explanations of lexical processing like Kawamoto's (see below) gaining credence among psycholinguists? - ---------------- References - ---------------- Kawamoto, Alan (1993). `Nonlinear Dynamics in the Resolution of Lexical Ambiguity: A Parallel Distributed Processing Account,' Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474-516. Tabossi, P. 1988. `Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential context.' Journal of Memory and Language 27, 324-340. Tabossi, P., Colombo, L., & Job, R. 1987. `Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance.' Psychological Research 49, 161-167. Tabossi, P., & Zardon, F. 1993. `Processing ambiguous words in context.' Journal of Memory and Language 32, 359-372. - ----------------- Thanks, =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- David Wharton Department of Classical Studies 237 McIver Building The University of North Carolina at Greensboro Greensboro, NC 27412-5001 email: whartondMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuncg.edu tel. (910)334-5214 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hello, all. I'm working on issues in class resolution strategies, particularly in Bantu languages. I'm looking for a native speaker of Xhosa; I would need grammaticality judgements and some help in constructing test sentences. I'm also looking for information on the coordination facts (and probably eventually native speakers) of Tamil and Telugu. Any information regarding resources or speakers would be appreciated. Thanks! - Michelle Moosally michelmMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueccwf.cc.utexas.edu Department of Linguistics UT-Austin Austin, TX 78712