Editor for this issue: Julie Wilson <julie
linguistlist.org>
>So, for example, I would speculate (since I have not done a full study >yet), that Bender's "Excellent Isogloss" #5, which he cites as *+bi, >*+bo, *+bI, and glosses as (among other meanings), "foot=leg[2]", is >possibly related to my PL p?fe and/or p?fo. It might be (at least marginally) helpful to learn what real language data these "proto-human" roots p?fe/p?fo might be based upon in order to be able to form an opinion about their validity. Stefan Georg Heerstrasse 7 D-53111 Bonn FRG +49-228-69-13-32Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue