Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
The ongoing discussion over German spelling reform is indeed fascinating, and I have wondered for some time why nobody brought it up on LINGUIST. For those who haven't heard about it yet: On September 27th, 1998, a referendum on spelling reform was held in the German state of Schlesiwg-Holstein, and the reform proposal was flatly rejected (56%, I think). (Since the other German states and the other German-writing countries are carrying through the reform, we now have the situation of an orthographic schism.) I think that putting the "blame" for the reform on linguists isn't completely wrong. Since Jacob Grimm's time, the majority of linguists have had the feeling that German spelling is improvable, and there have been numerous proposals. But of course the main "culprits" are educators - they wanted to simplify the German spelling system in order to allow more time for students to learn other things. In contrast to linguists, they have political clout. As far as "democratization of linguistic correctness" (Alexis's desideratum) is concerned, many linguists have argued that the spelling reform will give us exactly that: One of the main purposes of the reform was to introduce more variant forms, and thereby greater liberalization. Once you have this, it becomes more difficult to judge a person only on the grounds of their spelling abilities (as often happens in selecting someone for a job, even if the job does not involve writing at all). The opponents of the reform have not really been interested in a democratic process, because everyone knows that if a law passed by parliament were required for spelling reform, there would be no such reform (in Germany, all 16 state parliaments would have to pass the law). The opponents' sole goal has been to stick to the Kaiser's spelling rules (the current rules go back to 1901) and prevent any kind of modernization, or, worse, liberalizaation. Of course, spelling reform isn't popular, because people don't want to get used to new rules. And for the non-linguist, wurds ritten in a nue spelling simply look strainge. In my view, linguists have indeed failed -- they have not accompanied the reform with a broad public-relations offensive, explaining to the public why certain ways of spelling are better than others, and why the alternative (never changing anything, as in English spelling) would have desastrous effects. Martin - Dr. Martin Haspelmath (haspelmathMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueeva.mpg.de) Max-Planck-Institut fuer evolutionaere Anthropologie, Inselstr. 22 D-04103 Leipzig (Tel. (MPI) +49-341-9952 307, (priv.) +49-341-980 1616)
Just three remarks on spelling reform (1) Originally, the reform was desinged by experts, including linguists, but there was a whole lot of political intervention (the Bavarian minister of culture fighting against new spellings for certain words) so that some (most??) of the experts dropped out of the process (2) People blame politicians and bureaucrats, not linguists. People don't know linguists exist. Linguists did not say a whole lot in the debate. Writers & journalists did (3) Note it is, in my perception at least, RIGHT wing people who resist spelling reform. They do not think that "the German-writing people at large have the right to determine the spelling" but rather they want to impose their own concept of the purity of the language onto others. Personally, I feel people should be less concerned about this writing reforn that just affects schools. Nobody would have to care about it really - and by simply ignoring it, a democratic way of determinigspelling would come about. Gisbert Fanselow Motto: Linguist - tough job, but someone's gotta do it. Address: Linguistics Department University of Potsdam P.O. Box 601553 D-14415 Potsdam Germany Fon: x49-331-977-2446 Fax: x49-331-977-2761 URL: http://www.ling.uni-potsdam.de/~fanselow/Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please see our homepage http://www.ids-mannheim.de for detailed information on the subject "New German Spelling", or write to: Dr. Klaus Heller, Geschftsfhrer der Zwischenstaatlichen Kommission fr deutsche Rechtschreibung am Institut fr deutsche Sprache (IDS) Postfach 10 16 21 D-68016 Mannheim/Germany ___________________________________ Sekretariat der Geschftsstelle der Zwischenstaatlichen Kommission fr deutsche Rechtschreibung am IDS Geschftsfhrer: Dr. Klaus Heller Postfach 10 16 21 D-68016 Mannheim Tel.: 0621/1581-418 (Heller) Tel./Fax: -406 (Sekretariat) E-Mail: hellerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueids-mannheim.de WWW: http://www.ids-mannheim.de