Editor for this issue: Jody Huellmantel <jody
linguistlist.org>
- -------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 22:55:57 -0600 From: Linda Hudson <lindahudsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueibm.net> To: eubank
unt.edu Subject: Textual analysis of manifest destiny I am a Ph.D. student in the UNT History Department and writing a dissertation under the direction of Mike Campbell with Jim Lee as my minor professor in Folklore. Dr. Lee suggested that I contact you for suggestions as how to analyze further in another field my conclusion that John L. O'Sullivan did not write the anonymous article, "Annexation, " in the UNITED STATES MAGAZINE AND DEMOCRATIC REVIEW (July-August 1845) in which the term"Manifest Destiny" was first used. Instead, Jane McManus Storm, later Cazneau, whose pen name was Cora Montgomery, was his political editor, and she wrote the expansionist propaganda as well as that article containing the term manifest destiny. The method that I used to verify this conslusion aside from style, tone, voice, and those other things that signify an author was to type in the first 300 words of a signed article by O'Sullivan and Mrs. Storm and "Annexation." I then ran the WordPerfect program Grammatik that analyzed grammatical errors, and created a statistical base with which I compared the three articles. O'Sullivan, with a master's degree from Columbia University, had no grammatical errors, but because of such things as big words and other non grammatical flags, showed a similarity of 41.5 % to "Annexation." Mrs. Storm, on the other hand showed a 79.6 % similarity to "Annexation." with some categories having 100% similarity. Also some of the letters from O'Sullivan to President Polk were in her handwriting, but his rambling incoherent style, which would indicate that she was his secretary or assistant. Is there a computer program in Linguistics or grammar that you know of that would verify what I have concluded from the limited use of Grammatik. I have used other things beside grammar. For example, words per sentence, grade level, use of big words, complex sentences, and O'Sullivan used "We" whereas she used "Our" to describe the policy of the magazine and to refer to the United States. Also, a recent dissertation on O'Sullivan shows that when Mrs. Storm went to the NEW YORK SUN where she had her signed column on national politics as Washington correspondent, O'Sullivan then hired a new political editor, John Bigelow to write the political articles each month and they changed significantly in tone and voice and content. I may be reached at the oral history office on m-w between 10:00 and 4:00 where I am currently transcribing part-time. 565- 2549 or at my home at other times 817-232-0177. Thank you for your consideration and I eagerly await your response. I am to defend this dissertation on Dec 4., thus would like to get with you long before that date. Sincerely, Linda Hudson
Our literary theory reading group is reading Wray & Newitz's _White Trash: Race and Class in America_, and we came across an interesting point relating to linguistics. In the Introduction, the editors argue, "White trash becomes a term which names what seems unnamable: a race (white) which is used to code 'wealth' is coupled with an insult (trash) which means, in this instance, economic waste. Race is therefore used to 'explain' class, but class stands out as the principle term here, precisely because whiteness is so rarely connected to poverty in the U.S. imaginary." (p. 8) So, we were wondering about cases of epithets in other languages where the head of the NP is semantically connected to social class, or another culturally coded category--race, gender, ethnicity. Items relating to a sub-group within the stereotypical "majority" are of special interest. Please post responses to me at the address below. I'll post a summary to the list. Marnie Jo Petray Slippery Rock University of PA petrayMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueomni.cc.purdue.edu