Editor for this issue: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar <aristar
linguistlist.org>
Lack of response to the query about morphosyntactic features is in itself VERY interesting (LINGUIST 9.1599). One should wonder what it says about linguistics as a discipline. I myself didn't see the original query, so belatedly submit the following observations: 1) Grammatical gender: Lots of stuff over the centuries here. Semantically predictable or not? Phonologically predictable or not? Sex based or not? Maximal number of genders in a language?(Temne, a West Atlantic language, has 24.) 2) Noun classifiers and declension classes. These are noun features that surely count as morphosyntactic features. 3) All kinds of verb features have been discussed in the literature. Conjugation classes, valence, rule-features, etc. 4) While many pronominal features can be argued to be semantic in nature, lots could be considered morphosyntactic. Things such as status (requiring honorific status on an agreeing category, say).Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue