Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
Dear Linguists: I would like to correspond briefly with anyone who has had experience using the LaserIPA font IPAKielSeven, on a Mac with System 7.l with Microsoft Word 5.la, or with System 7.5.5 with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. Rebecca Larche Moreton 301 South Ninth Street Oxford, MS 38655 <mlrlmMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueolemiss.edu>
I am trying to find an American (or British) English Spoken corpus (1 million words aprox.) with a wide range of discourse: radio/tv interviews, political discourse, friends chats, educational lectures, etc. Do you know of any corpus with these features? Where and how can I get a hold of it? Thanks a lot in advance. Marma Josi Garcma Vizcamno (Spain)
Message 3: Locality and mental operations
Date: Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:24:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Frederick Newmeyer <fjnu.washington.edu>
Subject: Locality and mental operations
Intrinsic properties of grammars are often attributed to some feature of cognition in general. For example, a number of scholars have argued that the structure-dependence of grammatical rules and their cyclic application simply exemplify the way the human mind structures and processes ALL complex information, whether grammatical or otherwise. When it comes to LOCALITY conditions on rules, however, the consensus of those who would attribute to them an external explanation is that their origins lie in language USE. That is, the effects of principles such as Subjacency, the ECP, and other locality conditions are said to be attributable to the reduction of processing complexity in parsing. What I find interesting is that these same locality restrictions restrict COVERT operations as well as overt ones. Using GB terminology, it is widely accepted, for example, that the ECP affects interpretation. And in at least some languages it is clear that Subjacency affects the interpretation of the scope of wh-type elements, even if there is no movement. Indeed, in many OV languages there is little if any overt movement, yet one can show that the same principles constrain interpretation that constrain overt displacement of elements in movement-rich VO languages. What I am wondering is why this should be so. On-line parsing pressures could hardly be responsible. What could an 'external explanation' for this phenomenon be? Does anybody say that mental operations involving structured representations are subject to 'locality conditions'? If so, who? I'll summarize if there is enough interest. Fritz Newmeyer fjnMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueu.washington.edu
Message 4: Spanish word frequency dictionaries
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 08:34:04 +0200
From: Jovan & Jelena Filipovic <jfilipovicsezampro.yu>
Subject: Spanish word frequency dictionaries
Hello, I was wondering if anybody on the LINGUIST list could help me in locating bibliographical references regarding Spanish word frequency dictionaries/lists? I would really appreciate any information regarding this matter. Jelena Filipovic Dept. of Spanish language and linguistics College of Philology - Belgrade University Belgrade, YUMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue