linguistlist.org>
Editor for this issue: Anita Huang <anitalinguistlist.org>
compuserve.com>ISBN: 0 304 33908 3, Are we creatures who learn new things? Or does human mental development consist of awakening structures of thought? A view has gained ground - powerfully advocated, for example, by Stephen Pinker's book The Language Instinct - that language in much of its detail is hard wired in our genes. Others add that this holds too much of the specific knowledge and understanding expressed in language. When the first human Eve evolved from pre-human apes (it is claimed), her biological inheritance comprised not just a distinctive anatomy but a rich structure of cognition. Despite the impressive roll of converts that these ideas have gained, there is no good reason to believe them. Pinker's and other's arguments depend on earlier and more technical contributions, by writers such as Noam Chomsky. Many readers take these foundations on trust, not realising how weak they are. This book examines the various arguments for instinctive knowledge, and finds that each one rests on false premises or embodies a logical fallacy. A different picture of learning is suggested by Karl Popper's account of knowledge growing through 'conjectures and refutations'. The facts of human language are best explained by taking language acquisition to be a case of Popperian learning. Eve was not born a know-all. She was born knowing nothing, but able to learn anything. That is why we can find ways to think and talk about a world that goes on changing today. Geoffrey Sampson is a Reader in Computer Science and Artifical Intelligence at the Unibersity of Essex, UK. This book is priced 45 pounds and is available at any good bookshop or in case of difficulty contact Cassell on 01202 665432. Thanks very much Joanne Coen, CassellMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
The following contributing LINGUIST publishers have made their backlists available on the World Wide Web: