Editor for this issue: Julie Wilson <julie
linguistlist.org>
Dear colleagues: I am an EFL teacher at English Department, College of Foreign Languages, Soochow University, P. R. China. I have been teaching English for over 10 years. Now I teach fourth-year English majors & also graduate students. I have a graduate student who is working on her M.A. thesis. She is trying to prove that we should have a special variety of English for our Chinese EFL learners, which is different from Sinicized English. The main point is that English no longer belongs to any particular country, but is truly internationalinzed. Chinese English will better transmit our Chinese culture, such as "iron rice bowl". Since there are Indian English, Singaporean English & other Emglishes, why shouldn't we have our own Chinese English? I assigned my students to read Kachru & etc. & I have been sharing my views with many of my Chinese friends. I hope to have your opinions on this issue, esp. its relevance for us foreign language teachers---will fostering Chinese English hinder international communication & what will happen if there is no norm to refer to in EFL teaching & what should be the norm if there should be one? TIA. Yours, XiaojunMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue