Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
The idea of reversal of merger was one of the most important ones in the struggle by generative phonologists against earlier theories in teh 1960's, but most of the classic examples were later repudiated explicitly or tacitly from within the generative school. E.g., Halle had an early modern English example in the early 60's but the same data are analyzed without recourse to reversal of merger in SPE (though w/o admitting the importance of this!). Kiparsky in the late 70's exploded Postal's example from either Mohawak or Oneida (I forget which). The whole topic was studied in detail in my widely unknown 1981 dissertation, little bits of which are finally getting published here and there. Recently, I published the (revised) bit dealing with a rather important example from Tera cited by Newman in a Language article in or around 1968, for example. But, as has become usual in linguistics, once a paradigm is widely accepted, very few people seem to want to hear that its very foundations are in quicksand. Alexis Manaster RamerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue