Editor for this issue: Anita Huang <anita
linguistlist.org>
If (and it is a big 'if') languages other than English (but otherwise very similar to it) do not exhibit such variation as does English in terms of whether sentences like John promised Sue to hire Bill are OK, then the variation in English itself is unlikely to be due to underdetermination of the grammar by the primary data, as suggested by Georgia Green. In fact, I don't think I know of any clear case of variation due to underdetermination even though this is often posited (first I think by Zelig Harris). Are there any clear cases that anybody knows about? AlexisMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
My name is Patricia Bertini, I'm a language student at University in Pavia, Italy. I study linguistics as main subject and I'm working to my thesis which deals with Hungarian sociolinguistics; I'm going to study which linguistic changes ocurred in the advertisments' language after the 1989's socio-political changes. If you know any publication or peson who deals with this subject, please, let me know; I'm looking for any kind of material about advertisments in general too. If you have any kind of information that could be useful to me, please email me. Thanks in advance. Yours sincerely, Patricia BertiniMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I believe that it was dialect geographers of the late 19th or early 20th century who discovered that the georgraphical distribution of ling. variants can often tell us about their (pre)history, e.g., that there is more variation where the lg is older, that innovations tend to occur in large peripheral areas, while older forms survive in scattered but central ones, etc. Similar principles seem to have been found of value in population biology and perhaps in other sciences that deal with historically evolving systems. But I cannot seem to find out who came up with all this in linguistics or in biology. Any leads would be very welcome. AMRMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue