Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
Dear Netters, A while ago, I posted the following query. Longogbardi 1994 provides the following paradigm. a. Il mio Giani ha finalmente telefonato the my Gianni finally called up b. *Mio Gianni ha finalmente telefonato my Gianni finally called up c. Gianni mio ha finalmente telefonato Gianni my finally called up Gianni my finally called up d. Il Gianni mio ha finalmente telefonato the Gianni my finally called up He accounts for the paradigm in formalist terms and takes them as crucial evidence for N movement hypothesis. My questions are: 1. Is there any functional explanation? 2. Is there any meaning difference among a, c and d, especially between c and d. Bingfu Lu I now got eight responses and the following is my summary for your information. If somebody needs all these responses, let me know and I will forward them to the individual. SUMMARY Most importantly, several netters pointed out that the four sentences belong to different Italian dialects. Specifically, (a) is of standard Italian (Northern dialect) and (c) and (d) are of Southern dialects. The explanation of the pragmatic differences among the four sentences seem to be various form person to person. Francesca Fici points out that both (b) and (d) are bad. Rick Mc Callister says that while article + possessive + noun is the norm in standard Italian for inanimate objects, the article is dropped for human relationships. Giampaolo Poletto provides a very detailed explanation of the differences among the four. In his, opinions, (b) is not completely bad, but just not complete. Nigel J. Ross claims: (b). could more or less be heard in fast speech, the article "il" being just about lost. Nevertheless, there would be some slight slurred indication of the presence of "il". In addition to regional difference, (c) could also suggest a slightly stronger involvement, perhaps indicating a closer affection (than a.) In the Italian versions of "Oh my God!": "O mio Dio!" and "O Dio mio!", the second is in some ways stronger, more tragic, and - of course - more southern (more histrionic??). Thanks for the followin netters who offered their responses. Giulia Bencini <benciniMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuepsych.colorado.edu Pier Marco Bertinetto" <bertiNET
SNS.IT Rick Mc Callister <rmccalli
MUW.Edu Francesca Fici <frafici
CESIT1.UNIFI.IT Seth Jerchower <sejerchower
JTSA.EDU Gabriele Pallotti <pallotti
dsc.unibo.it Giampaolo Poletto <brave
chiostro.univr.it>, <dylandog
btk.jpte.hu> Nigel J. Ross" <njross
iol.it Bingfu Lu USC