Editor for this issue: Julie Wilson <julie
linguistlist.org>
Emily Bender's refutation of everybody's idea of ASL pronouns seems to me to be off the mark. It may be because of insufficient familiarity with ASL, but it's a little hard for me to accept this use of deictics (pointing to a preassigned part of the signing space) as 'phonology', except very metaphorically. The fact is that non-users of ASL do virtually the same thing in the gestures which accompany their speech, but in a way that is very individualized, while remaining, I'm sure, within culturally (or linguistically?) set bounds. The studies I'm familiar with of this latter phenomenon, while indicating the seeming universality of the phenomenon, point out the individual aspects which vary with the speaker, and these make it seem very unlikely to me that they are analogous to the phonology of spoken language. Jim James L. Fidelholtz e-mail: jfidelMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecen.buap.mx Maestri'a en Ciencias del Lenguaje Instituto de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades Beneme'rita Universidad Auto'noma de Puebla, ME'XICO