Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
Some weeks ago, Larry Trask challenged my reference to Don Ringe as someone who appears to be claiming that linguistic classification has already reached limits beyond which it cannot go. The following quotation seems to me bear that out very well, however: "Investigation of real-language examples shows that resemblances between the basic vocabularies of languages commonly believed to be related occur with greater-than-chance frequency, while resemblances between the basic vocabularies of languages not commonly believed to be demonstrably related do not occur with greater-than-chance frequency" (Ringe 1992:80) especially since he goes on to argue that the results are not "significantly different" if one looks beyond basic vocabulary or otherwise changes the method of comparison which he himself had employed. To be sure, this (to my mind, astounding and completely unjustified) claim seems to be contradicted by other things Ringe says, but I cannot see how this passage can be read to mean anything other than what I said, namely, that any resemblances which may be found among languages not ALREADY classified will be due to chance and hence will not be usable as a basis for FURTHER classification. If Ringe had said, as he should have, that his (as it happens, mathematically incompetent, see the review by Baxter and myself in Diachronica) investigation of a trivial number of unrepresentative examples shows (once the mathematical blunders are corrected) that the situation he claims is still at best an enormous overgeneralization of what is true in even those few cases, then that would be another matter. But in the absence of a quantifier like "some" or "a few", I can only understand his claim to be a universal one. Perhaps this is because I am not a native speaker of English. Can anybody who is one read his statement as anything else? Alexis MR Reference: Ringe, Donald A., Jr. 1992. On calculating the factor of chance in language comparison. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society. [Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 82(1).]Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue