Editor for this issue: Martin Jacobsen <marty
linguistlist.org>
In regard to Geoffrey Sampson's assertion that there is no stressed schwa in American English, wouldn't the vowel in "but" or first vowel in "mutton" qualify as a stressed schwa? Words like "construction" seem to have both a stressed and unstressed schwa in my version of standard or mid-Western English. To my ear, the RP pronunciation of the stressed vowels of "colonel" or "absurd" is more rounded than schwa, which has a more unrounded or neutral quality. (Perhaps closer to the lengthened but non-final French vowel in "beurre" or "fleuve". Ron CosperMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
In Algherese Catalan there is no schwa. Unstressed /a/ remains /a/, and unstressed /e/ and /E/ are replaced by /a/. (Unstressed /o/ and /O/ are replaced bu /u/: thus yielding a three vowel unstressed pattern) JohnMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
>>LANGUAGES/DIALECTS HAVING A STRESSED SCHWA IN >>THEIR VOWEL INVENTORY >> >>(a) I am interested in knowing about languages where >>schwa [i.e., a (mid) central vowel] appears >>more or less systematically in stressed position. > American English, at least as it's spoken in the Mid-West, has stressed schwa, as for example in words like "hut" and "cut," or the stressed vowel in "mother," "butter." (See for example Ladefoged 1975, A Course in Phonetics, pp. 28-30.) David Ludden * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David Ludden * * * * Dept. of Psychology * * University of Iowa * * Iowa City, IA 52242 * * * * Email: david-luddenMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuiowa.edu * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *