Topic: Disc 2002 Issues

---

Find more Disc listings | Find issue by number | Last 50 issues | LINGUIST home page

---

• 13.50 Disc: New: Phonetic Frenquencies & "Corpus Phonetics"
  1. Yuri Tambovtsev, Phonetic frequencies and corpus phonetics as a part of corpus linguistics
• 13.62 Disc: Phonetic Frenquencies & "Corpus Phonetics"
  1. Mark Jones, Re: 13.50, Disc: New: Phonetic Frenquencies & "Corpus Phonetics"
• 13.88 Disc: Phonetic Frequencies & "Corpus Phonetics"
  1. Greg Kochanski, Linguist 13.50, Phonetic Frequencies & "Corpus Phonetics"
• 13.99 Disc: Phonetic Frequencies & "Corpus Phonetics"
  1. Mark Jones, Re: LINGUIST 13.88, Phonetic Frequencies & "Corpus Phonetics"
• 13.114 Disc: Review, Phonology and Language Use, Bybee
  1. Joseph Davis, Review, Bybee (2001), Phonology and Language Use
• 13.559 Disc: New: Review of Black, Quiegolani Zapotec Syntax
  1. Martin Haspelmath, A. Carnie's review of Black, Quiegolani Zapotec Syntax
• 13.563 Disc: Review of Black, Quiegolani Zapotec Syntax
  1. Andrew Carnie, Review of Black, Quiegolani Zapotec Syntax
• 13.871 Disc: New: Economic Value of Lang Diversity
  1. Stirling Newberry, Re: 13.816, Media: Language Death: Wall Street Journal
• 13.878 Disc: Econonmic Value of Lang Diversity
  1. Geoffrey Sampson, Re: 13.871, Disc: New: Economic Value of Lang Diversity
• 13.881 Disc: Econonmic Value of Lang Diversity
  1. Mario Saraceni, Econonmic Value of Lang Diversity
  2. Ivan A Derzhanski, Re: 13.878, Disc: Economic Value of Lang Diversity
  3. Patrick-André Mather, 13.878, Disc: Econonmic Value of Lang Diversity
• 13.898 Disc: Economic Value of Lang Diversity
  1. Dan Villa, Re: 13.881, Disc: Economic Value of Lang Diversity
  2. Job M. van Zuijlen, 13.878, Disc: Economic Value of Lang Diversity
  3. tam6, Disc: Economic Value of Language Diversity
• 13.915 Disc: Econonmic Value of Lang Diversity
  1. A.F. GUPTA, Re: 13.878, Disc: Econonmic Value of Lang Diversity
  2. Martin Ehala, Re: 13.898, Disc: Economic Value of Lang Diversity
• 13.954 Disc: Economic Value of Language Diversity
  1. Stefanie Herrmann, Disc: Economic Value of Lang Diversity
  2. Theresa Savage, Economic Value of Language Diversity
• 13.962 Disc: Economic Value of Language Diversity
  1. Elizabeth J. Pyatt, Re: 13.954, Disc: Economic Value of Language Diversity
• 13.1114 Disc: New: Van Den Berg's Review of Mufwene
  1. Salikoko S. Mufwene, Van Den Berg's review of The Ecology of Language Evolution
• 13.1167 Disc: New: Re "Overcoming Plateaus in SLA"
  1. Ronald SHEEN, Re: 13.1160, Diss: Applied Ling: Zapata "Overcoming Plateaus..."
• 13.1178 Disc: Re "Overcoming Plateaus in SLA"
  1. Ronald SHEEN, Re: 13.1160, Diss: Applied Ling: Zapata "Overcoming Plateaus..."
• 13.1279 Disc: New: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Dan Everett, Falsifiability vs. usefulness
• 13.1288 Disc: Re: 13.1279:Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Kurt S. Godden, Re: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Roger Lass, Re: 13.1279, Disc: New: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  3. David Ludden, Re: 13.1279, Disc: New: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
• 13.1289 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Dan Everett, FW: 13.1279, Disc: New: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Kevin Gregg, Re: 13.1279, Disc: New: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  3. Dan Everett, RE: 13.1288, Disc: Re: 13.1279:Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  4. dave odden, Re: 13.1279, Disc: New: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
• 13.1291 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Dan Everett, RE: 13.1289, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Jens Stengaard Larsen, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
• 13.1304 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Geoffrey Sampson, Re: 13.1279, Disc: New: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Patrick Heinrich, Falsifiability vs. usefulness
• 13.1330 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Gale, George, RE: 13.1291, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Ahmad R. Lotfi, Disc. : falsifiability vs. usefuleness
  3. Farzad Sharifian, Re: 13.1279, Disc: New: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
• 13.1334 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Dan Everett, RE: 13.1330, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Dan Everett, RE: 13.1330, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
• 13.1348 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Farzad Sharifian, Re: 13.1334, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Ahmad R. Lotfi, RE: 13130:Disc. Falsifiability vs. usefulness
  3. Denis Bouchard, Falsifiability & Usefulness
• 13.1351 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Greg Matheson, Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Dan Everett, RE: 13.1348, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  3. Robert Whiting, Re: 13.1334, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  4. Mark Douglas Arnold, Re: 13.1348, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
• 13.1354 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Julian Bradfield, Re: 13.1351, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Dan Everett, RE: 13.1351, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  3. H.M. Hubey, Re: 13.1351, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
• 13.1367 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Mike Maxwell, Re: Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. H.M. Hubey, Re: 13.1354, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  3. Dan Everett, Falsifiability and usefulness
  4. Martha McGinnis, Re: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
• 13.1375 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Dan Everett, RE: 13.1367, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Dan Everett, falsifiability vs. usefulness: two addenda
• 13.1376 Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. H.M. Hubey, Re: 13.1367, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
• 13.1379 Disc: Next to Last Posting/Falsifiability/Usefulness
  1. Robert Whiting, Re: 13.1354, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Dan Everett, RE: 13.1376, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
• 13.1396 Disc: Last Post: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. H.M. Hubey, Re: 13.1379, Disc: Next to Last Posting/Falsifiability/Usefulness
  2. Denis Bouchard, Falsifiability II
• 13.1402 Disc: Addendum/Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  1. Dr Stefan Ploch, RE: 13.1367, Disc: Falsifiability vs. Usefulness
  2. Dan Everett, Reply to Ploch
• 13.1518 Disc: Review, Applied Linguistics, Larsen-Freeman
  1. Ronald SHEEN, Re: 13.1434, Review: Applied Linguistics: Larsen-Freeman (2000)
• 13.1729 Disc: New: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
  1. Ronald SHEEN (UQTR-Langues modernes), Re: 13.1701, Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
• 13.1737 Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
  1. GNJabbour, Disc: New: Review: Applied Ling.:Hinkel (2002)
• 13.1742 Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
  1. Ronald SHEEN, Re: 13.1737, Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
• 13.1754 Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
  1. GNJabbour, Disc:Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
• 13.1763 Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
  1. Ronald SHEEN (UQTR-Langues modernes), Re: 13.1754, Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
• 13.1774 Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
  1. rtroike, Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
• 13.1800 Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel 2002
  1. Tom Cobb, Re: 13.1742, Disc: Review: Applied Ling: Hinkel (2002)
• 13.1932 Disc: New: Language Description,Huddleston & Pullum
  1. Geoffrey K. Pullum, a response concerning The Cambridge Grammar
• 13.1952 Disc: Language Description, Huddleston & Pullum
  1. j.mukherjee@uni-bonn.de, Disc: A response concerning The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language
• 13.2005 Disc: Language Description, Huddleston & Pullum
  1. Geoffrey K. Pullum, some points of agreement about The Cambridge Grammar
• 13.2044 Disc: New: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
  1. Richard Sproat, Re: Linguist 13.2025: Media: NYT - Speech recognition
• 13.2046 Disc: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
  1. Elizabeth Coppock, Re: 13.2044, Disc: New: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
• 13.2048 Disc: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
  1. Richard Sproat, Re: 13.2046, Disc: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
  2. Kurt S. Godden, Re: 13.2046, Disc: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
  3. Suzette Haden Elgin, Re: 13.2044, Disc: New: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
• 13.2050 Disc: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
  1. Steven L. Roberts, Re: 13.2044, Disc: New: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
• 13.2065 Disc: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
  1. Richard Sproat, Re: 13.2050, Disc: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
• 13.2076 Disc: New: Re Sum: Tense and Lax i
  1. Mark Jones, Re 13.2053 Tense and Lax i - acoustic data
• 13.2077 Disc: Tense and Lax i
  1. Karen S. Chung, Re: 13.2076, Disc: New: Re Sum: Tense and Lax i
• 13.2084 Disc: Tense and Lax i
  1. Peter T. Daniels, Re: 13.2077, Disc: Tense and Lax i
• 13.2097 Disc: Tense and Lax i
  1. Roger Lass, Re: 13.2084, Disc: Tense and Lax i
• 13.2111 Disc: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
  1. David Horowitz, RE: 13.2065, Disc: Accuracy in Speech Recognition: Priorities
• 13.2114 Disc: New Re BBC Article:"First Lang Gene Discovered"
  1. Gian Carlo Buoiano, Re: 13.2096, Media: BBC Website, "First Lang Gene Discovered"
• 13.2126 Disc: Tense and Lax i
  1. paola escudero, Re: 13.2076, Disc: Tense and lax i
• 13.2130 Disc: Tense and Lax i
  1. paola escudero, Re: Re: 13.2076, Disc: Tense and lax i
• 13.2150 Disc: Tense & Lax i
  1. Roy Becker, Re: 13.2076, Disc: Tense and lax i
• 13.2326 Disc: New: Vocal Accommodation; Re NYT Article
  1. , Media/Disc: NYT, "Research Brings New Dimension to 'a
• 13.2369 Disc: New: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)?
  1. Joost Kremers, Replacing *(...) with something more practical
• 13.2381 Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
  1. Dan Everett, RE: 13.2369, Disc: New: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)?
  2. Christopher Bader, RE: 13.2369, Disc: New: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)?
• 13.2404 Disc: RE: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
  1. Peter T. Daniels, Re: 13.2381, Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
  2. Tim Stowell, Re 13.2369, Disc:Do We Need a Replacement for *(.)
  3. Chris Johnson, Re: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)?
• 13.2407 Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
  1. Laurence Horn, Re: 13.2369, Disc: New: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)?
  2. Dan Everett, RE: 13.2404, Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
  3. Nobue Mori, Re: 13.2369, Disc: New: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)?
• 13.2408 Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
  1. Yury Lander, RE: Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *
• 13.2592 Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
  1. Michael Johnstone, Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
• 13.2594 Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)?
  1. Kevin R. Gregg, Re: 13.2592, Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
  2. Carson Schutze, Re: 13.2592, Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
• 13.2602 Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)
  1. Dan Everett, RE: 13.2594, Disc: Do We Need a Replacement for *(...)?
• 13.2628 Disc: New: Darwinism & Evolution of Language
  1. Nemonemini, Can Darwinism explain the evolution of language?
• 13.2645 Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Language
  1. Brian Drayton, Re: 13.2628, Disc: New: Darwinism & Evolution of Language
  2. Remy Viredaz, 13.2628 Darwinism & Evolution of Language
  3. Jose-Luis Mendivil Giro, Re: 13.2628, Disc: New: Darwinism & Evolution of Language
• 13.2673 Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Language
  1. Nemonemini, Re: 13.2645, Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Language
  2. Andy Wilcox, Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Language
• 13.2704 Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Lang
  1. H.M. Hubey, Re: 13.2673, Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Language
  2. Nemonemini, Re: 13.2673, Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Language
• 13.2721 Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Lang
  1. H.M. Hubey, Re: 13.2704, Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Lang
• 13.2735 Disc: 2nd to Last Posting - Darwinism & Evolution
  1. Nemonemini, Re: 13.2704, Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Lang
  2. Nemonemini, Re: 13.2721, Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Lang
  3. Nemonemini, Re: 13.2721, Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Lang
• 13.2768 Disc: Last Post/Darwinism & Evolution of Language
  1. H.M. Hubey, Re: 13.2735, Disc: 2nd to Last Posting - Darwinism & Evolution
  2. Nemonemini, Re: 13.2721, Disc: Darwinism & Evolution of Lang
• 13.2985 Disc: Roger Bacon quote
  1. Leo A. Connolly, Roger Bacon quote
• 13.3156 Disc: Roger Bacon Quote
  1. Joseph F Foster, Re: 13.2985, Disc: Roger Bacon quote
• 13.3160 Disc: New: What is a question?
  1. Ahmad R. Lotfi, Disc. New: What is a question?
• 13.3162 Disc: Roger Bacon Quote
  1. Michael A. Covington, Re: 13.3156, Disc: Roger Bacon Quote
• 13.3191 Disc: What is a question?
  1. Bruce Despain, Re:Disc: What is a question?
• 13.3192 Disc: Roger Bacon Quote
  1. Michael A. Covington, Disc: Roger Bacon
• 13.3193 Disc: Roger Bacon Quote
  1. Mark Chamberlin, Disc: Roger Bacon
• 13.3208 Disc: What is a Question?
  1. Ahmad R. Lotfi, Disc. What is a question?
• 13.3309 Disc: New: Linguists and Advertising
  1. linguist, Lingusts and Advertising
• 13.3356 Disc: Linguists and Advertising
  1. Rich Alderson, Re: 13.3309, Disc: New: Linguists and Advertising
  2. Charley Rowe, Re: linguists and advertising
  3. Annie Ferreira, linguists and advertising
  4. Martha McGinnis, Re: Lingusts and Advertising
• 13.3363 Disc: Linguists and Advertising
  1. Paviour-Smith, Martin, Re: linguistics in advertising
  2. Johanna Rubba, Re: Linguists and advertising
  3. Daniel Buncic, Disc: Linguists and Advertising
• 13.3386 Disc: Linguists and Advertising
  1. Joseph F Foster, Re: 13.3363, Disc: Linguists and Advertising
  2. Meryl Siegal, Language and policy
  3. Harold F. Schiffman, language and advertising
  4. Emily McEwan-Fujita, Re: Linguists and advertising (sent a letter)
• 13.3405 Disc: Linguists and Advertising
  1. Jack Tauber, RE: 13.3386, Disc: Linguists and Advertising
  2. Suzette Haden Elgin, Disc: Linguists and Advertising
• 13.3417 Disc: Next to Last Posting/Linguists & Advertising
  1. Michael A. Covington, Re: 13.3405, Disc: Linguists and Advertising
• 13.3427 Disc: Last Posting: Language & Advertising
  1. Tej Bhatia, Language and Advertising
  2. Jo Rubba, Linguists and advertising

---

Find more Disc listings | Find issue by number | Last 50 issues | LINGUIST home page

---