Message-Id: <9610282344.AA00933@dragon.emich.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 96 18:35:09 EST
From: Stanley Dubinsky <DUBINSK@VM.SC.EDU>
Subject: Comment on Lidz reply to Reinhart from Dubinsky
To: Linguistics Conference <LINCONF@tamvm1.tamu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <9610281909.aa00627@monk.ling.udel.edu>
I still do not understand the difference between Lidz' example (14a)
and (14b). In response to Reinhart, Lidz says that _zag_ 'see' is lexically
reflexive in (14b) if _zich_ is an argument of the verb. If this is so,
then I am at a loss to understand why (14a) is ungrammatical. Surely,
_zich_ in (14a) is an argument of the verb _haat_. Why is that not
sufficient to make it lexically reflexive, as in (14b)?
Stan Dubinsky