The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2017 Fund Drive.
Personal Directory Information
|Institution:||University of Hong Kong|
|Email:||click here to access email|
|State and/or Country:||Hong Kong|
|Specialty:||Complementation, diachronic construction grammar, grammaticalization, evidentiality, modality in new Englishes|
|Selected Publications:||Believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch: A contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15, 2 (2010): 157-182. (with Timothy Colleman)
Revisiting BE SUPPOSED TO from a diachronic constructionist perspective. English Studies 90, 5 (2009): 599-623. (with Johan van der Auwera)
The nominative and infinitive in English and Dutch: an exercise in contrastive diachronic construction grammar. Languages in Contrast 9, 1 (2009): 144-181. (with Timothy Colleman)
The nominative and infinitive in Late Modern English: a diachronic constructionist approach. Journal of English Linguistics 36, 4 (2008): 314-340.
Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14, 2 (2007): 177-202.
The Contragram Dutch-French-English Contrastive Verb Valency Dictionary. Ghent: Ghent University. (http://www.contragram.ugent.be/cvvd.htm) [with T. Colleman, B. Defrancq and F. Devos]
Revisiting the passive of infinitival perception verb complements. Studia Neophilologica 76, 1 (2004): 12-29.
Translations as evidence for semantics: An illustration. Linguistics 41, 4 (2003): 757-785.
Is there semantics in all syntax? The case of accusative and infinitive constructions vs. that-clauses. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.) (2003) Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English. (= Topics in English Linguistics, 43.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 347-377.
The passive matrices of English infinitival complement clauses: Evidentials on the road to auxiliarihood? Studies in Language 25, 2 (2001): 255-296.
Infinitival copular complement clauses in English: Explaining the predominance of passive matrix clauses. Linguistics 36, 6 (1998): 1045-1063.
The choice between infinitives and that-clauses after believe. English Language and Linguistics 1, 2 (1997): 271-284.
|Announced on LINGUIST :||
Reconnecting Language: Morphology and Syntax in Functional Perspectives
Contrastive Analysis in Language
|Courses Taught:||English syntax
English construction grammar
English corpus linguistics
English as a language of science
Research seminar in English linguistics
|Dissertation Abstract:||Believe-Type Matrix Verbs and their Complements: Corpus-based investigations of their functions in discourse|
|Academic Paper Abstract:||
Raising: Dutch Between English and German
|Add to Linguist Directory||Update your entry|