* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
Title: Game-Theoretical Semantics
Edited By: Esa Saarinen
Series Title: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 5
Description:

This book is a collection of studies applying game-theoretical concepts and ideas to analysing the semantics of natural language and some formal languages. The bulk of the book consists of several papers by Hintikka, Carlson and Saarinen and discusses several of the central problems of the semantics of natural language.

The topics covered are the semantics of natural language quantifiers, conditionals, pronouns and anaphora more generally. Hintikka's famous essay presenting examples of 'branching quantifier structures' in English, as well as one formulating his 'any-every thesis', are included. The book also includes Hintikka's closely argued philosophical discussion of the relationships between the new semantical games with the language games of Wittgenstein. Other papers apply the game-theoretical approach to formal languages including tense logics and tense anaphora (Saarinen), deontic logic and Ross' paradox (Hintikka), and usual predicate logic (Rantala). The latter amounts to an explication of the 'impossible possible' worlds as is shown in Hintikka's concluding paper.

Publication Year: 2005
Publisher: Springer
Linguistic Field(s): Philosophy of Language
Semantics
Versions:
Format: Paperback
ISBN: 1402032625
ISBN-13: N/A
Pages: 412
Prices: U.S. $ 39.95
U.K. £ 19.00
 
LL Issue: 16.3087
 
 
Become a LL reviewer
  Want to become a LL reviewer?
Read guidelines.


View bibtex record for this book.
View BibTex record
Page Updated: 27-Nov-2009

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.