* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
Title: Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization
Written By: Bernd Heine
Series Title: Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 83
Description:

In this new work, Bernd Heine claims that the structure of grammatical categories is predictable to a large extent once we know the range of possible cognitive structures from which they are derived. The author uses as his example the structure of predicative possession, and shows how most of the possessive constructions to be found in the world's languages can be traced back to a small set of basic conceptual patterns. Heine identifies these patterns, and using grammaticalization theory he describes how each affects the word order and morphosyntax of the resulting possessive construction. He argues that grammaticalization theory explains much of the observable typological diversity which characterizes 'have'-constructions in the world's languages. Illustrated by a wealth of examples, this is an original and important statement from a leading linguist.

Publication Year: 2006
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories
Versions:
Format: Paperback
ISBN: 0521024137
ISBN-13: N/A
Pages: 290
Prices: U.K. £ 23.99
U.S. $ 43.00
 
LL Issue: 17.964
Also announced in:
9.941
 
Click on the thumbnail for more info
More Info on this Cambridge book
 
Read a review
Buy this book
To buy this book, select a version:
Paperback
 
CUP at LINGUIST
Become a LL reviewer
  Want to become a LL reviewer?
Read guidelines.


View bibtex record for this book.
View BibTex record
Page Updated: 09-Feb-2010

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.