* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
Title: Contrastive Rhetoric
Edited By: Ulla Connor
Ed Nagelhout
William Rozycki
URL: http://www.benjamins.com/cgi-bin/t_bookview.cgi?bookid=P%26bns%20169
Series Title: Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 169
Description:

This volume explores contrastive rhetoric for audiences in both ESL contexts and international EFL contexts, exposing the newest developments in theories of culture and discourse and pushing the boundaries beyond any previously staked ground. The book presents a comprehensive set of empirical investigations involving a number of first languages; 13 of the 17 authors are English-as-a-second-language speakers, many working in non-US contexts. This work develops a coherent agenda for contrastive rhetoric researchers, studying genres such as school writing, grant proposals, business letters, newspaper editorials, book reviews, and newspaper commentaries. Four chapters provide ethnographies and observations about contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of EFL and ESL. The book ends with a look to the future, suggesting it is more accurate to use the term intercultural rhetoric to account for the richness of rhetoric variation of written texts and the varying contexts in which they are constructed.

Publication Year: 2008
Publisher: John Benjamins
Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis
Pragmatics
Versions:
Format: Hardback
ISBN-13: 9789027254139
Prices: U.S. $ 142.00
 
LL Issue: 19.587
 
 
Read a review
Become a LL reviewer
  Want to become a LL reviewer?
Read guidelines.


View bibtex record for this book.
View BibTex record
Page Updated: 27-Nov-2009

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.