* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
Title: Intonational Phonology
Written By: D. Robert Ladd
Series Title: 2nd Edition
Description:

This second edition presents a completely revised overview of research on intonational phonology since the 1970s, including new material on research developments since the mid 1990s. It contains a new section discussing the research on the alignment of pitch features that has developed since the first edition was published, a substantially rewritten section on ToBI transcription that takes account of the application of ToBI principles to other languages, and new sections on the phonetic research on accent and focus. The substantive chapters on the analysis and transcription of pitch contours, pitch range, sentence stress and prosodic structure have been reorganized and updated. In addition, there is an associated website with sound files of the example sentences discussed in the book. This well-known study will continue to appeal to researchers and graduate students who work on any aspect of intonation.

Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 2008/372 pp.

Publication Year: 2009
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Linguistic Field(s): Phonetics
Phonology
Versions:
Format: Hardback
ISBN-13: 9780521861175
Prices: U.S. $ 120.00
 
Format: Paperback
ISBN-13: 9780521678360
Prices: U.S. $ 48.00
 
LL Issue: 20.914
 
More Info on this Cambridge book
 
Buy this book
To buy this book, select a version:
Hardback
Paperback
 
CUP at LINGUIST
Become a LL reviewer
  Want to become a LL reviewer?
Read guidelines.


View bibtex record for this book.
View BibTex record
Page Updated: 27-Nov-2009

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.