Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

The Vulgar Tongue: Green's History of Slang

By Jonathon Green

A comprehensive history of slang in the English speaking world by its leading lexicographer.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology

By Martina Wiltschko

This book presents a new theory of grammatical categories - the Universal Spine Hypothesis - and reinforces generative notions of Universal Grammar while accommodating insights from linguistic typology.


New from Brill!

ad

Brill's MyBook Program

Do you have access to Dynamics of Morphological Productivity through your library? Then you can by the paperback for only €25 or $25! Find out more about Brill's MyBook program!


Book Information

   
Sun Image

Title: Inflectional Economy and Politeness
Subtitle: Morphology-internal and morphology-external factors in the loss of second person marking in Dutch
Written By: Pierpaolo Di Carlo
Series Title: LOT dissertation series
Description:

The second person singular pronoun in Middle Dutch was du. The pronoun du
combined with finite verbs ending in the suffix –s. Both the pronoun du and
the suffix –s are lost in Modern Dutch. The loss of the pronoun and the
suffix is related: there is no variant of Dutch that has a suffix –s that
does not also have the pronoun du or vice versa. The question is how we
should understand this combined loss of the pronoun and the suffix.

The central claim in this book is that the decrease in the use of the
pronoun du (combining with the suffix –s) is driven by politeness. The
plural and polite pronoun gi (combining with the suffix –t) came to be used
in an increasing number of contexts. Although we can understand the
decrease of the pronoun du and the suffix –s as the result of politeness,
the loss of both the pronoun and the suffix is driven by inflectional
economy. The suffix that the pronoun gi combined with was more economical
than the suffix that du combined with. This claim is supported by data on
synchronic and diachronic variation in Dutch.

This study is of interest to scholars working in the field of historical
linguistics, corpus linguistics, pragmatics and inflectional morphology.

Publication Year: 2009
Publisher: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke (LOT)
Review: Not available for review. If you would like to review a book on The LINGUIST List, please login to view the AFR list.
BibTex: View BibTex record
Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics
Morphology
Pragmatics
Sociolinguistics
Subject Language(s): Dutch
Issue: All announcements sent out by The LINGUIST List are emailed to our subscribers and archived with the Library of Congress.
Click here to see the original emailed issue.

Versions:
Format: Paperback
ISBN-13: 9789078328858