Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.


New from Brill!

ad

Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin


Book Information

   
Sun Image

Title: Qualifying Standpoints, Stance Adverbs as a Presentational Device for Managing the Burden of Proof
Series Title: LOT Dissertation Series
Description:

A number of studies from pragmatics and discourse analysis have
investigated the function of stance adverbs, such as clearly, fortunately,
frankly, perhaps, and technically, when used to qualify utterances. Within
the field of argumentation studies, scholars who have paid attention to
these words have primarily focused on the so-called modal adverbs, and have
not considered the insights that can be gained by treating the class of
stance adverbs as the linguistic realisation of a certain move in an
argumentative discussion. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating
the strategic function of stance adverbs when qualifying an utterance that
functions as a standpoint.

In this study stance adverbs are examined as a presentational device at the
arguer’s disposal when putting forward a standpoint. Assuming the
pragma-dialectical approach to the study of argumentation, the aim is to
specify how qualifying a standpoint helps arguers to pursue their
rhetorical goals without overriding the dialectical requirements pertaining
to an argumentative discussion. The study is comprised of three parts. In
the first part, the question ‘What is a qualified standpoint?’ is answered
by combining illocutionary analysis of the move of advancing a standpoint
with pragma-linguistic study of stance adverbs. In the second part, the
question ‘Why would the protagonist qualify the standpoint?’ is answered
based on the concept of burden of proof, which is essential to the move of
advancing a standpoint. In the third part, the question ‘How does
standpoint qualification function strategically in an argumentative
discussion?’ is answered by postulating that the protagonist of a qualified
standpoint is interested in managing the burden of proof, an assumption
which builds on the results of the other two parts.

The book is of interest to advanced students and scholars of argumentation
and communication studies as well as those interested in an explanation of
language use from an argumentative perspective.

Publication Year: 2009
Publisher: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke (LOT)
Review: Not available for review. If you would like to review a book on The LINGUIST List, please login to view the AFR list.
BibTex: View BibTex record
Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis
Pragmatics
Issue: All announcements sent out by The LINGUIST List are emailed to our subscribers and archived with the Library of Congress.
Click here to see the original emailed issue.

Versions:
Format: Paperback
ISBN-13: 9789460930058